Event Details

November 01, 2009

Description

Psychiatric evaluation of respondent obtained.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Catherine M. Conrad person 53 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010124.jpg

Legal Opinion / Court Order (Exhibit) • 817 KB
View

This document is Page 2 of a 2010 New York court decision (Slip Op. 09090) regarding the suspension of attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The text details her suspension due to alcohol dependency and mental infirmity, denying her immediate reinstatement but converting her suspension to medical grounds. While part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cv-03388-PAE) likely related to the Epstein/Maxwell litigation, this specific page serves as a legal precedent or exhibit regarding attorney conduct and fitness.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad

2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)

View

Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.

2011-06-24

View

Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).

2007-12-18

View

Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).

2010-12-09

View

A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.

Date unknown

View

Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.

2000-01-26 • State of New York

View

The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests from the Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

2007-12-18 • First Judicial Department

View

The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad.

2009-01-01

View

A subsequent re-evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad was conducted.

2010-01-01

View

Catherine M. Conrad is called as a witness, granted use immunity after asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege, and questioned by Mr. Gair. She admits her prior testimony contained lies and omissions.

2012-02-15 • Courtroom

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
New York
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 19:45

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010124.jpg
Date String
November 2009

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event