January 01, 1926
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated his interpretation.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senator Pepper | person | 4 | View Entity |
| President Grant | person | 17 | View Entity |
| U.S. Supreme Court | organization | 403 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012393.jpg
This document is a legal analysis discussing the U.S. President's executive power in relation to enforcing laws believed to be unconstitutional. It summarizes a 1985 Congressional Research Service memorandum and five Supreme Court cases (from 1926-1991) that illustrate historical conflicts between the executive and legislative branches. Despite the user's query identifying it as 'Epstein-related', the text of this specific page contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related matters.
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court under the Appointments Clause.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal to enforce a law he believed was unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *United States v. Lovett*, where the President enforced a statute he believed was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court, leading to a concurrence by Justice Scalia on Presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case United States v. Lovett, where the President enforced a law he believed was unconstitutional, and the Justice Department argued against the law's constitutionality in court.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute while the Justice Department simultaneously attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judges and included a concurrence from Justice Scalia on presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award for efforts against trafficking, seen by DOJ as interfering with presidential authority.
Date unknown • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event