Event Details
January 01, 1991
Description
Supreme Court case *Freytag v. Commissioner*, where the Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court, leading to a concurrence by Justice Scalia on Presidential power.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Tax Court | organization | 34 | View Entity |
| U.S. Supreme Court | organization | 403 | View Entity |
| Justice Scalia | person | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012393.jpg
This document is a legal analysis discussing the U.S. President's executive power in relation to enforcing laws believed to be unconstitutional. It summarizes a 1985 Congressional Research Service memorandum and five Supreme Court cases (from 1926-1991) that illustrate historical conflicts between the executive and legislative branches. Despite the user's query identifying it as 'Epstein-related', the text of this specific page contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related matters.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Freytag v. Commissioner. A unanimous Court ruled on the appointment of special trial judges by the U.S. Tax Court under the Appointments Clause.
1991-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case *Myers v. United States*, where the Court vindicated the President's refusal to enforce a law he believed was unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the President refused to enforce a law limiting his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated his interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Freytag v. Commissioner, which ruled on the appointment of special trial judges and included a concurrence from Justice Scalia on presidential power.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court case Myers v. United States (272 U.S. 52) was litigated. The court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power as unconstitutional.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, where the court struck down a statute limiting the President's removal power.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case American Hospital Association v. NLRB (AHA) is cited, where the court upheld the NLRB's health care unit rule.
1991-01-01 • United States
The Supreme Court recognized the practice of presidential signing statements in the case of INS v. Chadha.
1983-01-01 • N/A
Supreme Court ruling in INS v. Chadha, which recognized the practice of presidents approving legislation while noting constitutional objections.
1983-01-01 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event