Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A hypothetical hearing is discussed, with opinions on whether it should be held and whether victims should be allowed to speak.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The victims | person | 8 | View Entity |
| the Judge | person | 138 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000642.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker critiques an article from the New York Law Journal. The speaker refutes the opinions of two professors who argued against holding a public hearing and allowing victims to speak in the Jeffrey Epstein case, calling their suggestions 'incredulous' and incorrect as a matter of law.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The jury is instructed on how to conduct their deliberations in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
2021-12-19
A cross-examination during which Ms. Pomerantz argues for the relevance of a witness's experiments on memory, distinguishing them from other evidence, and the Court issues an 'Overruled' ruling.
2022-08-10 • Court
A courtroom discussion regarding the offering of evidence. Ms. Comey attempts to offer something into the record, Mr. Pagliuca expresses confusion and then objects, requesting to approach the bench.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation (closing argument) was delivered by Ms. Menninger to a jury regarding the government's burden of proof in the case against Ms. Maxwell.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A detention hearing where the government argued against granting bail to a defendant, citing her as a flight risk.
2021-04-01 • Court
Two of the victims referenced in the Indictment met with the prosecution's office for the first time.
2019-01-01
A legal proceeding where testimony is given, evidence is admitted, and rulings are made.
Date unknown
Summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
A discussion took place in court regarding the appropriateness of sending new legal instructions to the jury. The defense's proposed instruction for Count Two was analyzed and criticized by the judge.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
An arraignment on the S1 superseding indictment is being conducted under special procedures due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
2021-04-01 • Courthouse
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event