Event Details
January 01, 1971
Description
Supreme Court ruling in Santobello v. New York
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court Justices | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00004866.jpg
This document is page 54 of a legal filing (Exhibit 310-1) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text contains legal arguments citing precedents such as *Santobello v. New York* and *Commonwealth v. Zuber* regarding the binding nature of prosecutorial promises and plea agreements under due process principles. It serves as a supporting legal authority, likely arguing that the government must honor previous non-prosecution agreements.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton, addressing prosecutorial power and responsibility.
1987-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court case U.S. v. Russell, addressing outrageous conduct by law enforcement.
1973-01-01 • U.S.
Supreme Court creates new rule regarding 'reckless disregard' and vacates death penalty for Tison brothers.
Date unknown • Washington D.C. / Arizona
Oral argument for 'I Am Curious Yellow' case
Date unknown • Supreme Court
Vacating of Bill Cosby's convictions
2020-01-01 • Pennsylvania
Author argued his first case before the Supreme Court representing Grove Press regarding obscenity laws.
Date unknown • Supreme Court
Supreme Court of Florida order denying discretionary review in Epstein v. Edwards.
2017-06-09 • Florida Supreme Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event