Event Details

This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Chapell, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on invoices for two shipments sent by 'G. Maxwell' in December 2002, establishing the recipients as Laura Casey Wasserman and Danny Hillis. The attorney also confirms that the recipients were not named Carolyn or Cardine and begins to question the absence of a transaction involving 'Ghislaine Maxwell' on an invoice.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus. The questioning centers on a 1995 research paper by Loftus, which involved an experiment to implant a false memory into participants. The experiment presented subjects with three true childhood stories, obtained from their parents or siblings, and one fabricated story about being lost in a shopping mall.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to direct Carolyn to specific passages in a prior deposition, leading to procedural clarifications from the judge and an objection from another attorney, Ms. Comey. The transcript captures the formal and often disjointed process of presenting evidence in a legal setting.

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.