August 30, 2011
Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register regarding an employer notice-posting requirement. The document details the Board's response to public comments received during the rulemaking process.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Board | person | 0 | View Entity |
| U.S. Federal Government | person | 0 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022316.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
Events with shared participants
Publication of a Federal Register notice containing rules and regulations, including a dissenting opinion on a new labor rule.
2011-08-30 • USA
A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.
2010-01-01
The Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notice and solicited public comments on its potential impact, particularly under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
2011-08-30
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event