Event Details
August 30, 2011
Description
Publication of a Federal Register notice containing rules and regulations, including a dissenting opinion on a new labor rule.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Board | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.
2010-01-01
Publication of a final rule in the Federal Register regarding an employer notice-posting requirement. The document details the Board's response to public comments received during the rulemaking process.
2011-08-30 • N/A (Federal publication)
The Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notice and solicited public comments on its potential impact, particularly under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
2011-08-30
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event