February 15, 2012
Conrad was questioned as a potential juror and deliberately lied about his educational background, concealing his law degree to ensure he was selected for the jury.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009255.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, capturing the direct examination of a juror named Conrad. Conrad admits that during jury selection, he deliberately lied to the court by concealing that he had a law degree from Brooklyn Law School. He states he did this because he believed any potential juror with a legal background would be dismissed, particularly in this case which involved lawyers on trial for tax fraud.
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Voir dire (jury selection) commenced for the trial.
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to bar authorities on February 26th that she lived in the Bronx.
Date unknown
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Witness Conrad was sworn to give a deposition under oath.
2009-03-24
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
2011-12-20 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event