Event Details

This document is an email chain from June 2022 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and likely an FBI agent. The USANYS office was nominating the 'Epstein / Maxwell case' team for a DOJ Director's Award for Superior Performance by a Litigation Team. The emails discuss gathering personal information (DOB, SSN, GS scale) from law enforcement partners to include them in the nomination, noting that the submission was urgent as 'sentencing is done' (referring to Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing around that time).

This document is an email thread dated June 1, 2022, regarding the submission of a Victim Impact Statement for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, scheduled for June 28, 2022. The sender (redacted) attaches several files, including PDFs and JPEGs labeled with terms like 'Suicide', 'Victim Impact Statement', and dates (2008, 2018). The email confirms the inclusion of photo exhibits for the recipient's files.

This document is a calendar entry and email notification containing the text of a court order filed on January 14, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, schedules Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and outlines deadlines for joint letters regarding the Speedy Trial Act and severed perjury counts.

This document is page 10 of a legal filing from June 25, 2022, related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to hear from individuals during sentencing, even if they do not strictly meet the definition of a 'victim' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It cites various legal precedents to support the admission of statements from 'affected individuals,' specifically mentioning 'Sarah' at the very end of the page.

This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on June 24, 2022. In the letter, Maxwell formally objects to Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant being legally characterized as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) for the purpose of sentencing. The defense argues these individuals do not meet the statutory requirements, specifically regarding their age at the time of alleged abuse, the timing relative to the indictment, and proximate harm resulting from the specific federal offenses of conviction.

This document is a legal motion filed on June 26, 2022, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim identified as 'Jane Doe' (who testified under the pseudonym 'Kate') is requesting permission to deliver an oral victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing scheduled for June 28. The motion cites 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to support the inclusion of victim statements.

This document is page 76 (PDF page 89) of a legal filing in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell), dated June 29, 2023. It outlines the Government's argument that Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable ('Point V'). Specifically, it discusses Maxwell's appeal against a 'four-level leadership enhancement' applied to her sentence, noting that Maxwell contests the finding that she acted as an organizer or leader of another criminal participant.

A court order filed on June 17, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules the sentencing for June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York and outlines logistics for press, public, and victim access, while prohibiting electronic devices and telephone dial-in access.

This page from a legal filing (likely a government appellate brief, dated June 29, 2023) argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's claim that Judge Nathan failed to explain the upward variance in her sentencing. The text asserts that Maxwell's argument is waived due to being cursory, and further details that Judge Nathan provided an extensive explanation regarding Maxwell's 'pivotal role' in the abuse of minors and the need for deterrence.

This document is page 25 of a legal ruling (Case 22-1426) filed on September 17, 2024. The appellate court affirms the District Court's sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, upholding the application of a 'leadership enhancement' and the length of the sentence due to the gravity of her role in facilitating the abuse of underage girls. The page concludes the discussion on sentencing and begins the final conclusion of the document.

A letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, representing Teresa Helm, asserts that Helm was trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 and requests permission for Helm to make an oral victim impact statement at the upcoming sentencing. The majority of the detailed statement is redacted.

This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.