DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg

609 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing (submission under seal)
File Size: 609 KB
Summary

This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on June 24, 2022. In the letter, Maxwell formally objects to Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant being legally characterized as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) for the purpose of sentencing. The defense argues these individuals do not meet the statutory requirements, specifically regarding their age at the time of alleged abuse, the timing relative to the indictment, and proximate harm resulting from the specific federal offenses of conviction.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorney
Author of the letter, representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter, United States District Court Judge.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case; objecting to the characterization of certain individuals as statutory victims.
Sarah Ransome Alleged Victim
One of the 'Individuals' whom Maxwell objects to being characterized as a statutory victim.
Maria Farmer Alleged Victim
One of the 'Individuals' whom Maxwell objects to being characterized as a statutory victim.
Teresa Helm Alleged Victim
One of the 'Individuals' whom Maxwell objects to being characterized as a statutory victim.
Juliette Bryant Alleged Victim
One of the 'Individuals' whom Maxwell objects to being characterized as a statutory victim.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
Legal firm representing Maxwell.
United States District Court
Court handling the case (SDNY).
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-06-24
Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
United States District Court, New York
Upcoming (relative to doc)
Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell
United States District Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
Address of the United States District Court

Relationships (5)

Bobbi C. Sternheim Legal Counsel Ghislaine Maxwell
Letterhead and context of submission on Maxwell's behalf.
Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial/Legal Dispute Sarah Ransome
Maxwell objects to Ransome being characterized as a victim.
Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial/Legal Dispute Maria Farmer
Maxwell objects to Farmer being characterized as a victim.
Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial/Legal Dispute Teresa Helm
Maxwell objects to Helm being characterized as a victim.
Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial/Legal Dispute Juliette Bryant
Maxwell objects to Bryant being characterized as a victim.

Key Quotes (3)

"Ms. Maxwell objects to characterization of Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant (collectively, the 'Individuals') as 'victims' of the counts of conviction"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell asserts that the Individuals are not statutory crime victims of the federal offenses of conviction"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg
Quote #2
"require that (i) each was a minor at the time to the alleged abuse, (ii) the alleged abuse occurred during the period alleged in the indictment, and (iii) the Individuals were 'directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of [the] Federal offense.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,635 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 672 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 68
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
June 24, 2022
Submission Under Seal
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Sitting By Designation
United States District Court
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
Ghislaine Maxwell submits this letter in response to the Court’s order (Dkt. 665). Ms.
Maxwell objects to characterization of Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette
Bryant (collectively, the "Individuals") as "victims" of the counts of conviction and disputes that
the Individuals qualify as statutory victims within the definition of a "crime victim" contained in
the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §3771 ("CVRA").
The issue that requires resolution in advance of sentencing is whether the Individuals, or
their representatives, have statutory crime victim status under the CVRA. Under the statute,
definition of "crime victim" takes as a given that there has been a "federal offense" committed.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). Ms. Maxwell asserts that the Individuals are not statutory crime
victims of the federal offenses of conviction, which require that (i) each was a minor at the time
to the alleged abuse, (ii) the alleged abuse occurred during the period alleged in the indictment,
and (iii) the Individuals were "directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of
[the] Federal offense." Id.(emphasis added).
DOJ-OGR-00010592

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document