Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Juror No. 1 participated in voir dire, during which they stated their highest level of education was a BA in English.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 1 | person | 133 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010066.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding where a person named Ms. Edelstein is questioned about a potential conflict of interest involving Juror No. 1. The juror shares the same name, Catherine Conrad, as a suspended New York attorney. Ms. Edelstein explains that she dismissed the possibility of them being the same person because the juror stated during voir dire that her highest level of education was a BA in English, which she believed ruled out the possibility of her also being a lawyer.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A jury asked for a judge's clarification on legal terms ("willfully" and "knowingly") during deliberations regarding David Parse.
2011-05-24
David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.
2011-05-24
A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.
2022-02-24 • Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York
The government conducted a Google search on Juror No. 1 after she received a letter.
Date unknown
An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.
Date unknown
On the third day of jury deliberations, Juror No. 11 needed an emergency medical procedure and was excused, replaced by an alternate, and the jury was instructed to restart deliberations.
2012-05-16
Juror No. 11 was displaced during jury deliberations due to a health emergency and replaced with an alternate.
Date unknown • Court
The juror's verdict was delivered.
2022-05-24 • Court
A subsequent investigation regarding Juror No. 1 was conducted by Theresa Trzskoma.
Date unknown
A trial proceeding where a witness (Brune) is being questioned about a juror's behavior and a note sent by the juror.
Date unknown • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event