DOJ-OGR-00020350.jpg

583 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / judicial filing (united states court of appeals for the second circuit)
File Size: 583 KB
Summary

This is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, but the appellate court directed those specific concerns back to the District Court.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant-Appellant
Appealing district court orders denying bail; also referred to as 'Sealed Defendant 1'
Pierre N. Leval Circuit Judge
Judge present regarding the appeal
Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Circuit Judge
Judge present regarding the appeal
Richard J. Sullivan Circuit Judge
Judge present regarding the appeal
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe Clerk of Court
Signed the order for the court

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The court issuing the order
United States District Court
The lower court whose orders are being appealed
United States of America
The Appellee (prosecution)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'

Timeline (3 events)

2020-12-28
District Court Order Denying Bail
District Court
2021-03-22
District Court Order Denying Bail
District Court
2021-04-27
Court Order Issued
New York, NY
Ghislaine Maxwell Judges of the Second Circuit

Locations (2)

Location Context
Venue of the court term
Address of the courthouse

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversaries United States of America
Case caption: United States of America, Appellee, v. Ghislaine Maxwell... Defendant-Appellant.

Key Quotes (3)

"it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release... is DENIED."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020350.jpg
Quote #1
"During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020350.jpg
Quote #2
"To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020350.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 68, 04/27/2021, 3087429, Page 1 of 2
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL,
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
[Signature of Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe]
[Seal of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals]
EXHIBIT A
DOJ-OGR-00020350

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document