Event Details

April 01, 2022

Description

Filing of Document 653 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.

Participants (6)

Name Type Mentions
Juror 50 person 685 View Entity
The Court organization 2003 View Entity
defendant person 747 View Entity
The government organization 3113 View Entity
the defendant person 996 View Entity
GHISLAINE MAXWELL person 9575 View Entity

Source Documents (5)

DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg

Court Order / Legal Opinion (Page 32 of 40 from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) • 642 KB
View

This document is page 32 of a 40-page court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the legal standard for 'implied bias' regarding jurors, specifically rejecting the argument that a juror must be presumed biased simply for having personal experiences similar to the issues at trial. The court cites Second Circuit precedents (Daugerdas, Torres, Brown, Garcia) to support the conclusion that implied bias is a narrow category reserved for extreme situations, such as deliberate lying to get on a jury, rather than merely shared experiences.

DOJ-OGR-00020956.jpg

Court Filing (Order/Opinion) • 681 KB
View

This document is page 13 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on April 1, 2022. The Court is analyzing a motion regarding juror misconduct, specifically applying the *McDonough* test to determine if a juror's false answers during *voir dire* necessitate a new trial. The Court ultimately finds that the juror's false answers were not deliberate and proceeds to analyze the second prong of the test regarding bias (actual, implied, or inferable).

DOJ-OGR-00020959.jpg

Court Filing / Judicial Opinion • 614 KB
View

This document is page 16 of a court ruling in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), addressing potential juror misconduct. The Court analyzes Juror 50's failure to disclose past sexual abuse on a questionnaire, concluding that the errors were not deliberate but rather the result of rushing and carelessness. The judge credits Juror 50's testimony, citing his calm demeanor, consistency, and the fact that he testified under a grant of immunity with the threat of perjury.

DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg

Legal Court Filing / Judicial Opinion / Order • 676 KB
View

This document is page 14 of a court order (Document 653) filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text analyzes legal standards for investigating juror misconduct, specifically whether a juror lied during voir dire and the limitations imposed by Federal Rule of Evidence 606 regarding inquiring into jury deliberations. It cites various precedents (McCoy, Nix, Tanner) to establish the boundaries of a 'McDonough inquiry' into juror bias.

DOJ-OGR-00020953.jpg

Court Filing / Legal Opinion (US District Court) • 656 KB
View

This document is a court order from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) detailing the testimony of 'Juror 50' regarding inaccuracies in his jury questionnaire. Juror 50 admitted to being a victim of childhood sexual abuse by a stepbrother but claimed his failure to disclose this was an inadvertent mistake caused by rushing, distraction, and misunderstanding the questions. The text outlines his justifications, including technical issues, a recent breakup, and a belief that the sheer volume of jurors made his specific answers less critical.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell

2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals

View

A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.

Date unknown

View

Real Estate Purchase under fake name

Date unknown • Unknown

View

The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.

2022-08-10

View

Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.

Date unknown

View

A meeting where the government showed the witness (Visoski) records of three flights.

Date unknown

View

LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.

2020-07-29

View

The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.

Date unknown

View

The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.

Date unknown • Virginia

View

A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.

2022-08-10 • courthouse

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
6
Source Documents
5
Extracted
2025-11-20 19:25

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00020975.jpg
Date String
2022-04-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event