The document states Larry Visoski was one of the individuals Epstein employed to work at his residences.
Described as one of Epstein's 'pilots'.
Described as one of Epstein's 'pilots'.
Visoski was one of Epstein's pilots.
The document states that Larry Visoski would be alerted ahead of time for Epstein's flights, suggesting a role in scheduling or logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00009602.jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against a defendant's claim of prejudice due to the unavailability of certain witnesses. The filing contends that the defendant has failed to prove these witnesses (architects Pinto and Salhi) were 'key' or that their testimony would have been irreplaceably helpful. It further points out that the defendant had the opportunity to, and did, cross-examine other employees of Epstein, such as Juan Alessi and pilots Larry Visoski and David Rodgers, to establish facts about the defendant's role and time spent at Epstein's residences.
DOJ-OGR-00010438.jpg
This legal document, page 21 of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell should not receive an aggravating role enhancement because she did not supervise other criminal participants. It specifically refutes the idea that she supervised Sarah Kellen, presenting testimony from Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was hired by Epstein to replace Maxwell's duties, not to work under her. The document also states that other employees, like pilots Larry Visoski and David Rodgers, had no knowledge of any criminal conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00013452.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot for Epstein. Rodgers testifies to never observing any evidence of sexual activity on the flights, such as discarded clothes, sex toys, or condoms, and states they have no reason to believe Epstein engaged in sexual activity with underage girls or women on the flights they piloted. The questioning then begins to explore the flight scheduling process, mentioning that Rodgers and a Larry Visoski would be alerted before a flight.
DOJ-OGR-00021025.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing arguing against a defendant's claim of prejudice due to the death of potential witnesses. The prosecution contends that the defendant's assertions about what these witnesses (architects and a housekeeper) would have testified are speculative and unsubstantiated. It further argues that other witnesses, such as Juan Alessi, Larry Visoski, and David Rodgers, were available and did testify about similar matters, like renovations at Epstein's residences, meaning the information was obtainable through other means.
Entities connected to both Epstein and LARRY VISOSKI
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship