Relationship Details

This document is a forensic log of digital messages from February 21, 2017, extracted from a device associated with the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves Epstein and a redacted individual discussing World Economic Forum (WEF) councils, with one participant remarking that 'No one on council very clever.' The exchange also includes a USA Today opinion piece about Bill Gates, with Epstein adding 'AND THIS --- on gates/as discussed.'

This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged between June 16 and June 17, 2019. The conversation involves Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual discussing 'painkillers,' 'meds,' and whether Epstein's views are influenced by medication. Epstein defends his intellectual stance as 'Bayesian' and notes that an unnamed female ('She') continues to be in contact.

A digital message log from December 1, 2018, detailing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The discussion focuses on Chinese geopolitics, specifically the CCP leadership and reformists. The conversation concludes with the redacted individual sharing their schedule, mentioning a trip to Harvard and a scheduled lunch with Tom Pritzker in New York on the following Monday.

This document is a digital communication log from February and March 2017 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted correspondent. The conversation includes a shared news article about the Trump administration proposing budget cuts to development agencies, with the sender noting this would affect 'BG' (likely Bill Gates), the UN, USAID, and the World Bank, commenting that it is 'good news for America.' The thread concludes with Epstein asking 'are we set?' and the correspondent replying 'Not yet' but promising 'This week though.'

This document is an email thread from February 6, 2011, involving Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted correspondent. The correspondent sent Epstein a New York Times review of the documentary 'Inside Job' (2010), which analyzes the 2008 financial crisis. Epstein replied, dismissing the documentary by stating, 'it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf' (likely meaning 'info').

This document contains a message log from February 5, 2019, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. They discuss a Washington Post article regarding federal subpoenas issued to the Trump Inaugural Committee. Epstein denies attending meetings with Michael Flynn or Middle Eastern representatives during the transition, notes that Mueller transferred the case to US Attorneys, and comments that 'Barrack and HBJ' (Tom Barrack and likely Hamad bin Jassim) are the primary targets ('starts of the show').

This document is a forensic log of text messages from December 6, 2018, extracted from a device associated with Jeffrey Epstein (using the email alias jeeitunes@gmail.com). The conversation is between Epstein and a redacted individual, discussing the return of Mohammed bin Salman's (MBS) brother to Washington D.C. to 'show strength,' noting he is the only one MBS trusts. The conversation also includes casual references to fast food (Dominos Pizza and KFC), with Epstein quoting the phrase 'parts is parts'.

This document is a log of text messages from March 6, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss a meeting in D.C. involving 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) and 'Trump' on the 20th or 21st, shifting the topic of discussion from 'war' to 'Cyber,' which the respondent notes 'Israel [is] best at.'

This document is a forensic log of electronic messages exchanged on July 31, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers geopolitical topics, including the status of the Russian Ruble, a reference to Libya and Rome, and a statement agreeing that Trump is right to pursue a partnership (presumably with Russia). The document originates from the House Oversight Committee records.

This document is a log of email messages exchanged on December 5, 2018, primarily from the address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation covers biological metaphors for social structure (mentioning 'apothosis' or apoptosis), a proposal for a Harvard course on 'the gangster game' modeled on world leaders like Trump and Putin, and a discussion about the 'Me Too' movement and populist nationalism. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.

This document contains a log of electronic messages exchanged on November 21, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on the legal standing of 'djt' (Donald Trump) regarding the Mueller investigation, with the redacted party relaying a third party's legal opinion that obstruction charges are unlikely but financial issues in the 'southern eastern district' pose a risk. Epstein reacts positively to the news regarding the Mueller investigation, calling it 'Epic'.

This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee showing an exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (via 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and an unknown redacted individual on June 3, 2019. They discuss a CNN article regarding George Nader's arrest on child pornography charges. The conversation includes Epstein noting a 'Mandatory minimum 15' [year sentence] and the redacted individual speculating that 'MBZ' (likely Mohammed bin Zayed) turned Nader over to authorities.

A log of digital messages from September 28, 2018, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation takes place at 4:00 AM, the day after the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings. Epstein strongly criticizes the female prosecutor (Rachel Mitchell) used during the hearings and suggests a series of aggressive cross-examination questions that he believes a criminal defense attorney should have asked the accuser.

This document is a digital forensic log of text messages exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes') and a redacted individual in late June 2019, shortly before Epstein's arrest. The conversation includes a check-in on Epstein's well-being ('U ok?') and a specific discussion regarding Israeli politics, questioning if 'Ehud' (likely former PM Ehud Barak) will become Prime Minister again, noting that the outcome 'depends on coalition.' The document originates from House Oversight Committee files.

An email sent to Jeffrey Epstein on January 23, 2017, marked with high importance. The sender comments that the inauguration was amazing and makes a derogatory joke comparing the women marching (presumably the Women's March) to Michelle Obama's fitness initiatives.

This document is a message log from February 18, 2017, obtained by the House Oversight Committee. It details a conversation involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') where participants discuss 'zero knowledge protocols' and a political strategy to 'convince bill' (likely Bill Gates). Epstein explicitly suggests a quid pro quo arrangement where they could 'get something for BG' if the administration (Trump admin) agrees to keep PEPFAR funding.

This document is a log of digital communications from March 12, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves Epstein sharing a New York Times article concerning Donald Trump and Deutsche Bank, followed by a discussion of the 'Martin Act,' a New York anti-fraud law. Epstein pastes an excerpt (likely from Wikipedia given the citation brackets) explaining the Martin Act's use by Eliot Spitzer against Merrill Lynch.

This document is a forensic log of text messages from June 15, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. Epstein complains about a lack of privacy and 'many people coming to see me.' The conversation shifts to geopolitical commentary, referring to 'Donald' (Trump) as the 'Crazy father of the world' and discussing Saudi Arabia moving closer to China, which the correspondent describes as a 'GREAT OPPORTUNITY.'