The two are engaged in a formal, transcribed conversation about a legal hearing and deposition, with Mr. Goldberger expressing offense and Mr. Leopold formally offering an affidavit, indicating they are likely opposing parties in a legal matter.
Goldberger challenges Leopold's method of objection.
DOJ-OGR-00033118.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, capturing a tense exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger. Mr. Goldberger is upset about a hearing that was canceled at the last minute, forcing him to disrupt a vacation, and questions the reason. Mr. Leopold denies knowing why it was canceled, speculates it relates to his own recent deposition, and offers to provide an affidavit from a Mr. Pincus to confirm his lack of knowledge.
DOJ-OGR-00032999.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Leopold, Goldberger, and Tein, dated July 26, 2017 (based on the footer stamp). The text captures a contentious exchange where Mr. Leopold defends his objections regarding 'improper foundation,' while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein accuse him of wasting time and obstructing the process. Mr. Tein specifically reprimands Leopold for failing to appear earlier in the morning after a separate hearing was cancelled, allegedly breaking a prior agreement.
Entities connected to both Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship