Relationship Details

This document outlines recommendations for the U.S. Congress regarding its approach to China. It advocates for promoting transparency through congressional oversight, integrity by distinguishing real threats like espionage from manageable issues like Confucius Institutes, and reciprocity by carefully considering the broader bilateral relationship and potential consequences before taking action. The page concludes with a detailed list of sources cited in the section.

This New York Times opinion piece discusses the escalating trade war between the US and China, detailing three new "red lines" set by Beijing regarding tariffs and purchasing agreements that make a deal increasingly difficult. The author observes that recent US actions, including leaks and sanctions against Huawei, have pushed China toward a more adversarial stance, with leadership now questioning the value of a trade deal and preparing for a potential Cold War.

This document outlines a policy of reciprocity in US-China relations, highlighting the asymmetry in access between the two nations. It notes that American scholars, diplomats, and NGOs face significant restrictions in China, while their Chinese counterparts enjoy open access in the US. The text calls for American institutions to demand greater reciprocity and for the US government to promote and protect opportunities for American actors in China.

This document, titled "Policy Principles for Constructive Vigilance," outlines principles proposed by a Working Group to protect American institutions from Chinese interference while maintaining a productive relationship. The primary principle discussed is transparency, which involves actions by NGOs, Congress, executive agencies, the media, and universities to investigate, monitor, and report on Chinese influence activities. These measures are intended to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate influence and strengthen protections against manipulation by outside actors.