Relationship Details

This legal document is a letter dated December 9, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter is a filing in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It presents a jointly proposed limiting instruction for the jury regarding Government Exhibit 52, specifying that the exhibit is only to be considered for showing a potential link between Maxwell and listed contacts, not for the truth of the information itself.

A subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on September 30, 2021, commanding AIC Title Service, Inc. to produce all records relating to aircraft N750A and N722JE from January 1, 2008, to the present. The subpoena is issued in connection with the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is an email header dated October 29, 2021, confirming the acceptance of a Touhy Request related to the criminal trial 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' (Case S2 20 Cr. 330). The sender and recipient information has been redacted.

This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case US v. Maxwell. Dated November 20, 2021, the email submits proposed redactions for the transcripts of the voir dire (jury selection) proceedings that took place on November 16, 17, and 18, 2021.

This document set contains three items: a 2021 court subpoena commanding a redacted individual to testify in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell; a 2015 letter from The Mar-a-Lago Club's Human Resources Director to a law firm stating that employment records from 1999-2001 are unavailable, though a specific name (redacted) was found on a 2000 termination list; and business cards for an FBI Special Agent and an NYPD/FBI Task Force Detective.

This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' filed on July 2, 2020, by the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It details charges including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, alleged to have been committed in the Southern District of New York. The document also notes her bond status and legal representation by Lawrence Vogelman.

This is a legal letter dated February 16, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter accompanies documents filed under seal that contain proposed redactions related to Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of a fact-finding inquiry into the conduct of 'Juror 50' during the jury selection process.

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the production of documents for a subpoena issued to Lockheed Martin in the case of United States v. Maxwell. The correspondence involves a Paralegal Specialist from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and external representatives (likely Lockheed Martin's counsel) coordinating the setup of a secure 'USAFx' folder to transfer Bates-labeled files. Technical issues regarding folder access are discussed.

This document is an email dated October 8, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to redacted recipients (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team). The email concerns the identification of a witness from JP Morgan for the trial 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' and includes an attachment of draft financial exhibits (500 Series). The sender is following up on a previous conversation to coordinate witness testimony regarding financial matters.

This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.

This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 27, 2021, directed to Amazon.com, Inc. regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It demands the production of subscriber records, order history, and billing information for specific email addresses (gmax1@mindspring.com, gmax@mindspring.com, gmax1@ellmax.com, gmax@ellmax.com) covering the period from January 1, 1994, to January 1, 2005.

This legal document is a motion filed by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on September 10, 2020, requesting the consolidation of two appeals. The first is from her criminal case (United States v. Maxwell) and the second is from a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell). Maxwell argues the cases are intertwined because new information from the criminal case is relevant to the court's decision to unseal deposition material in the civil case.

This document is a letter dated October 15, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter addresses a complaint about legal mail delivery delays at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), detailing the specific administrative steps mail must go through (warehouse logging, legal department retrieval, internal tracking) before reaching an inmate. The government consulted with MDC legal counsel to explain these procedures to the court.

This document is a Court Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 11, 2020. It orders the United States to submit an amicus brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with the criminal case United States v. Maxwell (No. 20-3061) and adjourns a hearing previously scheduled for September 22, 2020.

This document is a letter dated December 17, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Legal Department of the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The letter, sent via Federal Express, provides a password (which is redacted) for a disc containing discovery materials related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a subpoena from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued on July 7, 2021, to the New York State Department of Health. It commands the production of a birth certificate for a redacted individual in relation to the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance date for the production of evidence was set for November 29, 2021.

A Certificate of Compliance filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. Rina Danielson certifies that the associated filing contains 3,097 words, executed and notarized on May 9, 2025. The document bears a Department of Justice footer.

This document is a letter dated January 5, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca argues against the government's request for a hearing concerning a juror who revealed post-trial that they were a victim of sexual assault. He contends the request is premature and that, based on publicly available information and legal precedent, the court should order a new trial without an evidentiary hearing.

This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 15, 2021. It commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear and testify on November 29, 2021, in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena is signed by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and bears the seal of the court.

This document is a court subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Dated July 13, 2021, it commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify.

This legal document, filed on July 6, 2020, is a 'Commitment to Another District' from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It orders that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, be transferred to the Southern District of New York to face charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and perjury. The document confirms she has been detained following a hearing and is represented by Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.

This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.

This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It commands the Sacramento County Clerk/Recorder to appear in court on November 29, 2021, and to produce a birth certificate for a specific individual whose name has been redacted.

This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 16, 2021. It commands a redacted individual associated with the Palm Beach School District to appear in court on November 29, 2021, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document outlines the parties and related legal proceedings concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the Petitioner, Defendant, and Appellant, with the United States as the Respondent, and references two specific court cases: United States v. Maxwell in the Second Circuit (2024) and United States v. Maxwell in the S.D.N.Y. (2021).

This document is a letter from D. John Sauer, Solicitor General for the U.S. Department of Justice, dated June 6, 2025, to Honorable Scott S. Harris, Clerk of the Supreme Court. It requests an extension until July 14, 2025, for the government to file its response in the case 'Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States, No. 24-1073,' citing attorney unavailability due to other pressing matters, and notes that the petitioner does not oppose this extension.

This is a court subpoena issued on August 28, 2021, by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands a redacted individual to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss and a court official.

This is a Motion Information Statement filed on July 15, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, is formally requesting to be relieved from her duties as continued counsel for the appeal. The opposing party is the United States, represented by AUSAs from the Southern District of New York.

This legal document, part of a court filing, discusses the enforceability of an anticipatory waiver of extradition in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It contrasts different legal precedents, citing cases where such waivers were considered unenforceable or an 'empty gesture' (e.g., United States v. Epstein) against others where they were conditions of release, though their enforceability was not explicitly determined. The document highlights the legal ambiguity surrounding whether a foreign country, like France, would honor such a waiver.

This is a legal letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, representing their client Ghislaine Maxwell, are requesting to file documents related to her motion for bail under seal. They seek to submit an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for the public, citing privacy concerns and the need to protect confidential information, including financial documents, as governed by a protective order.

This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.

This legal document is an application filed on March 7, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The application requests a court order to grant immunity to and compel the testimony of a witness, whose name is redacted, for a hearing scheduled on March 8, 2022. The witness had previously refused to testify, invoking their privilege against self-incrimination.

This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It lists the judicial panel (Judges Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi) presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). It identifies the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant).

This is a formal letter from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated April 14, 2025, to the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The letter confirms the filing and docketing of a petition for a writ of certiorari for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. It specifies the petition was filed on April 10, 2025, and assigned the Supreme Court docket number 24-1073 on April 14, 2025.

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on March 9, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is based on an application by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted individual to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022. The document states that this individual had refused to testify, citing the privilege against self-incrimination, but the U.S. Attorney judged their testimony to be in the public interest.

This legal document is a Memorandum Opinion & Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 9, 2021. The judge overrules the Defense's objections to the admission of Government Exhibit 52 on grounds of authentication and hearsay. The ruling follows testimony from the Government's authenticating witness, Juan Alessi, and establishes the legal standard for the evidence's admissibility.

This legal document is a letter dated March 1, 2022, from attorney Todd A. Spodek of Spodek Law Group to District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter concerns the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Spodek informs the court that his client, identified only as Juror 50, will invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at a court-ordered hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022.

This is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States for case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. On May 9, 2025, Rina Danielson served a 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' upon the attorneys for both parties (David Oscar Markus and Solicitor General D. John Sauer) via mail. The document is stamped with DOJ bates number DOJ-OGR-00000215.

This is a legal filing from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution is moving to admit photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence as evidence. The government argues that these photographs are relevant to the case because they serve to corroborate the testimony of a witness identified by the pseudonym 'Jane'.

This is a letter filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 17, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is writing to limit the scope of cross-examination by the defense of law enforcement agents, specifically stating they will object to questions regarding the agents' 'failure to utilize some particular technique,' citing a prior ruling from November 1, 2021.

This legal document is a letter dated March 7, 2022, from the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Assistant Attorney General to Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The letter grants authorization to seek a court order to compel a witness, whose name is redacted, to testify in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. This order would provide the witness with immunity, overcoming any refusal to testify based on the privilege against self-incrimination.

This is a Summary Order and Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on November 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). The document lists the panel of judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) who presided over the term held on October 19, 2020. It identifies the legal counsel for both the Appellee (US Attorneys including Lara Pomerantz and Maurene Comey) and the Defendant-Appellant (Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.).

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to the Clerk of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter cites the precedent set in United States v. Watkins to argue that the Bail Reform Act permits a court to conduct a fact-based, "conduct-specific inquiry" for felonies involving a minor victim, rather than being limited to the legal elements of the charge. This submission is intended to provide supplemental authority to the court concerning the upcoming argument in Maxwell's case.

This document is a status letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated May 5, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the protocols for flashlight security checks at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), explaining that checks are generally conducted every 30 minutes in the SHU and hourly in the general population. However, the letter specifies that Ghislaine Maxwell is subject to checks every 15 minutes because she is on an 'enhanced security schedule,' though not on suicide watch.

This legal document is a joint letter dated January 10, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a schedule for sentencing and the resolution of severed perjury counts as directed by the court. The Government's position is to schedule the sentencing proceeding approximately three to four months from the date of the letter to allow time for a Presentence Investigation Report and resolution of post-trial motions.

This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on January 11, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her attorney Christian Everdell, appeals an order from December 28, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan that denied Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

This is a legal letter dated January 19, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves to inform the court that Maxwell's counsel has filed a Motion for a New Trial and requests that all materials concerning Juror No. 50 be kept under seal until the court rules on the motion.

This is a formal notification letter dated January 21, 2025, from the Supreme Court of the United States to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. The letter confirms that Justice Sotomayor has granted Maxwell's application for an extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, setting the new deadline to April 10, 2025. The document includes filing stamps indicating it was processed by the Court of Appeals on January 27, 2025.

This legal document, part of a court filing, discusses the legal arguments concerning the enforceability of an anticipatory waiver of extradition in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text cites various legal precedents, noting that while some defendants have offered such waivers, courts have often not ruled on their enforceability or have deemed them unenforceable, as in the Epstein case where it was called an "empty gesture." The document highlights the significant legal uncertainty surrounding whether a foreign country would enforce such a waiver, making it a contentious point in the defendant's case against extradition to the United States.

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a memorandum of law dated April 1, 2021, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The page first outlines the 'Standard of Review' for bail decisions, citing precedents like United States v. Horton and United States v. Shakur. It then begins an argument that Ghislaine Maxwell should be released under §3142(i) because the 'horrific conditions' of her 'de facto solitary confinement' prevent her from effectively preparing her defense.

This document is a letter motion dated August 24, 2020, from attorney Laura A. Menninger to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney requests permission to file documents under seal on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is that the documents contain information designated as confidential by the Government under the terms of the existing Protective Order in the case.

This document is a legal letter dated August 21, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is writing to oppose a request by the defense to use confidential discovery materials from this criminal case in separate civil litigation. The Government highlights that over 165,000 pages of discovery have been produced, some of which pertain to an ongoing grand jury investigation and must remain sealed to protect that investigation.

This is a 'Commitment to Another District' court form from the District of New Hampshire regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It lists specific charges originating from the Southern District of New York, including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury. The document notes Maxwell is represented by Lawrence Vogelman, Esq., and identifies the case numbers 20-mj-132-01-AJ (NH) and 20 CR 330 (Charging District).

This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney Christian Everdell, is appealing an order entered on December 28, 2020, which denied her renewed motion for release on bail. The document notes that Maxwell is currently 'Committed' (incarcerated) and the case is presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This page is from a legal filing (Document 204) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's claims that the indictment is vague or that 'grooming' is not illegal behavior, citing Second Circuit precedents that define grooming as a form of enticement or inducement of minors for illegal sexual activity. The document asserts that the indictment adequately informs the defendant of the charges under 18 U.S.C § 371, § 2422, and § 2243.

This document is a Mandate and Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). Issued on November 9, 2020, following an October 19, 2020 term, it lists the presiding judges and legal representation for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense. The document confirms the filing of the order in the Southern District of New York.

This document is a letter dated December 31, 2020, from Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorney requests a two-week extension for filing pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is the large volume of discovery materials and the fact that Maxwell was recently placed in a 14-day COVID-related quarantine at MDC, which has suspended in-person legal visits.

This document is a letter dated June 27, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley explains that her client, victim Virginia Giuffre, cannot physically attend a court hearing due to a medical issue and requests permission to read Giuffre's statement on her behalf. A handwritten note on the document, signed by Judge Nathan, grants this request, ordering that counsel will be permitted to read a shortened version of the statement.

This document is a court order filed on March 7, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details an application by US Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted male witness to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022, despite the witness refusing to do so based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The document cites Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003 regarding immunity and compulsion of testimony.

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on December 16, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, denies the Government's motion to preclude remaining witnesses from testifying.

A letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to use discovery materials from her criminal case in unrelated civil litigation. The Government notes it has produced over 165,000 pages of evidence and argues that the materials in question are appropriately designated as confidential because they relate to an ongoing criminal investigation and grand jury proceedings.

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government is submitting motions *in limine* under seal, requesting redactions to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, and specifically requesting that 'Section X' remain redacted until the conclusion of the trial.

A legal letter dated December 30, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter confirms that neither the prosecution nor the defense proposes any redactions to the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.

This document is a letter filed on October 15, 2021, by the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning the deadline for the defendant to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a victim's sexual behavior. The document outlines the legal standards and purpose of Rule 412, emphasizing victim privacy protections.

This document is page 8 (filed as Page 9 of 15 in Document 17) of a legal filing dated September 10, 2020. It argues for the consolidation of two appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: one regarding the unsealing of deposition material in her civil case (Judge Preska) and another regarding a protective order in her criminal case (Judge Nathan). The text asserts that consolidation is required for efficiency and fairness.

This legal document is a letter dated June 26, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves as a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In it, the government submits a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was attached to her victim impact statement, in response to a court order issued that same day.

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

This document is a letter dated March 2, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Sternheim requests a proffer from the counsel for 'Juror 50' to explain why the juror is asserting their Fifth Amendment right, especially since the juror publicly claimed to have answered all questions honestly. In a handwritten note dated March 3, 2022, Judge Nathan denied the request, stating no grounds were offered for it.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 15, 2021. It discusses the scheduling of motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a victim's sexual behavior. The document contains an endorsement by Judge Nathan ordering that such motions be filed by October 27, 2021, with responses due November 1, and a tentative hearing on November 5.

This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.

This document is a letter dated July 21, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, Pagliuca requests a court order to prohibit the government and its agents from making extrajudicial statements about her case. The letter argues that such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, citing legal precedents to support the court's authority to issue such an order.