Relationship Details

This document is a proposed court order filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion by Bradley J. Edwards to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena related to the underlying civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a 'Notice of Filing' submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It serves to notify the court and opposing counsel that Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has filed Exhibits A, G, H, I, and N under seal. These exhibits are attached to a declaration by her attorney, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, in support of her opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena.

This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 12, 2020, in the civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Loretta A. Preska denies Defendant Maxwell's request for a three-week stay on the unsealing of documents, a request she based on the emergence of "critical new information" related to her separate criminal case. The court ruled that since Maxwell is bound by a protective order and cannot disclose this information, her unproven assertion ('ipse dixit') is not a compelling reason to grant the stay.

This document is a formal certification filed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It pertains to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in relation to the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca certifies his compliance with local rules and his good standing with the Colorado bar.

This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.

This document is a motion filed on June 29, 2016, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file specific exhibits (A, G, H, I, and N) under seal because they were designated as confidential in the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) in the Southern District of New York. The document includes a certificate of service indicating the motion was served electronically to attorney Jack Scarola representing Bradley J. Edwards.

This document is a legal response filed on June 24, 2020, by Intervenors Julie Brown and the Miami Herald Media Co. arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's objections to unsealing specific court documents (Dkt. Entries 143, 164, 172, 199, and 230). The Intervenors argue that Maxwell's privacy claims are unsubstantiated and do not outweigh the public interest in disclosure, particularly regarding allegations of sex trafficking and abuse of minors. The filing explicitly mentions that the documents in question include a 'Flight Log Summary Chart' and 'flight logs', police reports, and deposition transcripts, arguing that these should be made public.

This document is a formal notice filed on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. It informs the court and opposing counsel (specifically Bradley J. Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola) that 'Exhibit B' related to a subpoena status notice has been filed under seal. The underlying case referenced is Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.