Relationship Details

This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.

This document is a legal cover letter dated December 8, 2020, from attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are submitting a Renewed Motion for Bail under seal, providing both an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for public filing to protect privacy and confidential financial information. The document references previous correspondence and protective orders governing discovery materials.

This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that due to 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (including books, podcasts, and documentaries), standard jury selection is insufficient. They request the Court allow individual sequestered voir dire and limited attorney-conducted questioning to identify and remove biased jurors.

This document is a letter motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, on April 30, 2021, requesting Judge Alison Nathan to order the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to accept two hard drives containing discovery materials for Maxwell's review. The defense argues the current format of 2.2 million pages is difficult to navigate, and they have reorganized the files to be more user-friendly. Judge Nathan granted the order on May 3, 2021, with a stipulation allowing MDC counsel to submit objections by May 4, 2021.

A formal letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists twelve reply memoranda the defense intends to file in support of various motions, including motions to dismiss the indictment and suppress evidence. It also outlines the procedural handling of these documents, specifically regarding redactions of confidential information and filing under seal.

This document is a letter dated November 8, 2021, from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to the US Attorney's Office regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a Rule 16 disclosure, listing specific documents the defense may use in their case-in-chief, including AT&T phone records, FedEx records, Customs and Border Patrol records, Shopper's Travel records, and Larry Visoski flight manifests. The letter also lists General Releases from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (with names redacted), Palm Beach residence floorplans, and the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting her motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Jeffrey Epstein signed in Florida. Maxwell argues that the NPA's clause immunizing 'potential co-conspirators of Epstein' explicitly covers her and bars the current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The defense contends that the government's attempt to limit the NPA geographically (to Florida) or to specific crimes is contradicted by the plain text of the agreement and legal precedent regarding plea agreements.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting a motion to dismiss counts one through four of her indictment as time-barred. The defense argues that the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, which extended the statute of limitations, cannot be applied retroactively because Congress explicitly rejected a retroactivity provision. Additionally, the defense contends that the Mann Act offenses charged (enticement to travel and transportation of a minor) do not 'necessarily entail' the sexual abuse of a child, and thus the extended statute of limitations under § 3283 does not apply.

This document is an affidavit filed on July 27, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. It certifies that the defense conferred with the prosecution regarding a protective order but remains in dispute over two issues: restrictions on government witnesses regarding discovery materials and the defense's ability to name victims who have already gone public. The document includes redactions of the names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys involved.

This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 26, 2022, to February 4, 2022. It details procedural motions regarding the sealing of documents for a new trial motion, media requests for access (Daily News, ABC, NBC, NYT), and redactions of witness names. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing public access with the integrity of potential inquiries and granted a defense request for an extension of time for post-verdict motions.

This document is a court docket sheet (Page 14 of 208) from the SDNY regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from July 14, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell pleading Not Guilty to multiple counts, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and the Judge issuing orders regarding discovery schedules and prohibiting extrajudicial statements. The document also details procedural motions filed by defense attorneys Pagliuca and Everdell, and responses from prosecutor Alison Moe.

This document is a letter dated July 6, 2020, from attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense informs the court that they finally made contact with Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center that evening and she has waived her physical presence for upcoming proceedings. The defense and prosecution have agreed to schedule the remote arraignment and bail hearing for the morning of July 14, 2020.

This document is the signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 13, 2021. The text requests the Court to grant individual sequestered voir dire due to the sensitive nature of the charges and pervasive pretrial publicity. The document is signed by attorneys Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The proceedings took place on December 18, 2021, at 9:10 a.m. in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorneys including Maurene Comey) and the defense (including Jeffrey Pagliuca and Christian Everdell).

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referring to earlier 2020 district court proceedings) detailing legal filings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between August 10 and August 24, 2020. The entries track a series of motions regarding discovery disclosure, protective orders, and sealing requests, involving defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and government prosecutors (Rossmiller, Comey, Pomerantz). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders setting deadlines for responses and replies regarding these disputes.

This document is a signature page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated February 24, 2022. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. It lists the legal counsel present for both the government (Moe, Pomerantz, Comey, Rohrbach) and the defense (Sternheim, Everdell), as well as the defendant herself. The judge acknowledges reviewing preparatory documents, including a probation report and defense memoranda, prior to the sentencing.

This document is a legal letter dated December 27, 2021, from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan during the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests additional jury instructions to clarify 'apparent errors' in the jury's understanding of Count Four, specifically regarding whether aiding in a return flight (rather than the flight to the location of sexual activity, such as New Mexico) constitutes guilt. The letter references a specific jury note (Court Exhibit #15) and cites the indictment regarding transportation from Florida to New York for sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, for the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It attests that on January 25, 2021, Christian R. Everdell served a legal motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York via their official email addresses.

A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 8, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter requests permission for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media equipment (VCR, cassette players, etc.) into the courthouse for an evidence view scheduled for mid-April 2021.

This document is a letter motion filed on October 25, 2021, by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a one-week extension (to November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, citing conflicting deadlines including Rule 412 briefing. The government has consented to this extension request.

Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.

This page contains the conclusion and signature block of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document requests that the court vacate Maxwell's conviction and enter a judgment of acquittal. It lists the contact information for her legal defense team, including Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

A legal letter dated October 14, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense opposes the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) related to alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that these materials are exculpatory under Brady v. Maryland because the witnesses allege abuse by Epstein but do not accuse Maxwell of participation.

This document is a legal docket summary from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, chronicling court filings and orders from February 23 to March 18, 2021. The entries detail the procedural battle over Maxwell's third motion for bail and other pretrial motions, including the setting of deadlines, the granting of extensions, and a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the redaction and sealing of sensitive information in court documents. The log illustrates the ongoing legal maneuvering between Maxwell's defense team and the U.S. Government prosecutors.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from late December 2020 to January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, the listing of her indictment charges (sex trafficking, conspiracy, perjury), and procedural motions regarding extensions of time and the filing of a Notice of Appeal. The document records rulings by Judge Alison J. Nathan and correspondence from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense counsel.

This document is a docket sheet from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from July 13 to July 27, 2020. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the court's decision to grant the government's motion to detain her pending trial, the setting of discovery deadlines, and various motions and orders related to attorney appearances and extrajudicial statements. The document outlines the initial procedural steps in the case following her arrest.

A court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted a motion by attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell because she retained new appellate counsel.

This document is the signature page (page 65 of 66) of a legal filing (Document 642) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It lists the defense counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Bobbi Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 15, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that Counts 1 and 3 of the Superseding Indictment are multiplicitous (charging the same crime twice based on identical facts) and requests the Court order the government to elect one count to prosecute and dismiss the other prior to trial to avoid jury prejudice. The filing contends that the government has failed to prove the existence of two distinct conspiracies.

This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.

This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.

A court document filed on July 10, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Ghislaine Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at her arraignment, bail hearing, and conference. The document is signed on her behalf by her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, and specifically cites the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for waiving physical presence at the bail hearing.

This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is an electronic Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated April 15, 2021. It confirms the filing of a Certificate of Service regarding a motion by attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in case 21-58. The notice lists recipients including Cohen Gresser LLP and redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries between July 27 and July 30, 2020, regarding *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. Key entries include a dispute over the terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing these victims/witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.

This document is a court docket log (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of transcripts, a renewed motion for bail by Maxwell's defense (Christian Everdell), and the Court's order (Judge Alison Nathan) approving specific redactions to protect privacy interests and law enforcement integrity. The document also notes the Government's opposition to the bail application and the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the USA.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is page 2 of a legal letter filed on March 2, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The defense attorneys request that Maxwell's lawyers be present for an upcoming proceeding and ask for a continuance until May. The letter is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and lists co-counsel Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the signature page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing from February 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense team, including attorneys Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, and Sternheim, is requesting the court to vacate Maxwell's conviction, dismiss the S2 Indictment, and enter a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 based on insufficient government proof.

This is the final page (6 of 6) of a legal filing submitted on August 10, 2020, to Judge Alison J. Nathan by attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document requests that Maxwell be released to the general population within the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) and be granted increased access to a computer terminal to review discovery materials for her defense.

This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.

This legal document, filed on March 2, 2022, is a request from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, led by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, ask the Court to postpone an important proceeding until a convenient date in May. The reason for the request is to ensure that Ms. Maxwell's lawyers can be present for the matter.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 394) from the court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell from three law firms: Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; Cohen & Gresser LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 1, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a court docket report from December 2020 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders allowing redacted filings to protect privacy interests, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion. The docket entries list sealed documents, letters from defense counsel Christian Everdell regarding sealing and schedules, and a specific letter regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering dates from July 8 to July 13, 2020, regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details administrative motions for attorney appearances (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the filing of a superseding indictment, and specific logistical orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, including COVID-19 protocols and public access via telephone.

This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This is a legal letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, representing their client Ghislaine Maxwell, are requesting to file documents related to her motion for bail under seal. They seek to submit an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for the public, citing privacy concerns and the need to protect confidential information, including financial documents, as governed by a protective order.

This is the final page (page 4) of a legal letter dated July 27, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of Cohen & Gresser LLP respectfully request that the Court enter a proposed protective order for their client, Ms. Maxwell. The document was filed on July 28, 2020, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.

This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.

This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

A letter from defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery laptop. The defense argues that the standard prison computer lacks necessary software to review voluminous evidence before the July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request. The letter highlights that Maxwell previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period in late 2020.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions,' filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell: Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010267.

This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.

This document is a page from a court docket (likely an appellate record for Case 21-58) detailing events in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case between December 18 and December 28, 2020. It records the filing of legal arguments regarding Maxwell's renewed bail motion, the Judge's orders approving specific redactions to protect third-party privacy, and ultimately the Court's order on December 28 denying the defendant's motion for release on bail. The document lists Maurene Comey for the prosecution and Christian Everdell for the defense.

This document is a page from a court docket (S.D.N.Y.) dated July 2020, detailing proceedings shortly after Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest. It outlines strict COVID-19 protocols for the courthouse, addresses victim notification rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sets a briefing schedule regarding detention pending trial. The document also records the official notices of appearance for Maxwell's defense team: Mark Cohen, Christian Everdell, and Laura Menninger.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.

This document is a page from the court docket (SDNY CM/ECF) for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It records defense motions for a Bill of Particulars and a Third Motion for Bond, as well as multiple sealed documents and correspondence regarding MDC confinement conditions. The document also includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling responses for the bond motion and granting an extension for defense replies.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum submitted on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on July 10, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the document outlines Maxwell's opposition to the government's motion for her detention. The filing lists her legal counsel from the law firms COHEN & GRESSER LLP and HADDON, MORGAN & FORMAN P.C.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.

A legal cover letter dated March 15, 2021, from attorneys Cohen and Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter lists ten reply memoranda being filed on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. These filings relate to motions to dismiss indictments, suppress evidence (involving a redacted subpoena target), sever counts, and request a bill of particulars.

This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.

This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple defense motions to dismiss charges or separate trials. The document lists attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, and Jeffrey Pagliuca acting on Maxwell's behalf before Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a Memorandum of Law, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 13, 2021. It is filed by the legal team for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion seeks an individual and sequestered jury selection process (voir dire) to be partially conducted by the defense counsel.

This document is an Affidavit and Waiver of Extradition filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on December 14, 2020. In it, Maxwell confirms her citizenship (US, UK, France), her residence in the US since 1991, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She acknowledges reviewing the charges with her legal counsel from Cohen & Gresser, LLP, and indicates an understanding of her rights regarding extradition treaties between the US and the UK.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering entries from December 18 to December 28, 2020. It details the legal proceedings surrounding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, including the Government's opposition, Maxwell's reply, and Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving specific redactions to protect third-party privacy. The page concludes with an entry on December 28, 2020, where the Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail.

This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document contains a court docket log from December 4-8, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail procedural disputes over sealing documents, a schedule for a renewed bail motion, and significant back-and-forth regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC Brooklyn. Judge Nathan denied a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez personally but ordered the government to provide written updates every 60 days concerning Maxwell's access to legal materials and the frequency of searches conducted on her.

This document represents a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 3, 2022. The entries focus heavily on post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50', who was scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2022. Key developments include Juror 50's attorney notifying the court that the juror intended to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Government's subsequent notification that they were seeking approval to compel the juror's testimony via immunity orders (18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003).

This document is a legal waiver filed on July 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In the document, Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming court conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, authorizing her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to participate on her behalf. Everdell signs the document on Maxwell's behalf and affirms that he has discussed the waiver and her rights with her.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).

This document is an 'Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance' filed on January 26, 2021, for case 21-58 (USA v. Maxwell). Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser, LLP formally enters his appearance as lead counsel for the Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document confirms contact information and notes a related previous case, USA v. Maxwell 20-3061.

A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.

This is a legal letter from Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 8, 2021. The defense requests a 30-day extension to appeal the denial of Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The extension is requested to allow the defense time to consider filing a third bail application with more stringent conditions and to review recently produced documents without losing the right to appeal the previous denial.

This document is the first page of a court record for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the appearances for the trial held on December 1, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, listing the presiding judge, legal teams for both the prosecution and defense, and other law enforcement and paralegal personnel present.

Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).

This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.

This document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense is requesting the entry of a protective order regarding discovery materials but outlines two remaining disputes with the government: 1) restrictions on government witnesses posting discovery materials to the internet, and 2) the defense's ability to publicly identify alleged victims who have already spoken on the public record.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.

This document is a legal declaration filed on August 1, 2025, by Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the transition of legal counsel, confirming that Maxwell has retained David Markus and Melissa Madrigal of Markus Moss PLLC specifically to handle a government unsealing motion. The document confirms Maxwell's consent to Cohen & Gresser's withdrawal and notes that the withdrawing firm asserts no liens and will transfer files to the new counsel.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.

This document is a page from a court docket log for Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022. It details a series of legal filings that occurred primarily on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan and various letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning evidence (birth certificates, Exhibit 52), witnesses (Witness-3, Accuser-3), subpoenas, and proposed redactions to court documents.

This document is a court docket report from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the denial of her renewed motion for release on bail, with Judge Alison J. Nathan citing her as a flight risk and listing the specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury. The docket also tracks procedural filings, including sealed documents and motions by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell for extensions of time, one of which was granted and another regarding an appeal notice that was denied.

A legal letter filed on December 31, 2020, by defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her recent 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. The prosecution consented to the request, and a new schedule is proposed leading up to a July 12, 2021 trial date.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering entries from January 12 to January 25, 2021. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the payment of appeal fees, and a dispute between the Bureau of Prisons and the Court regarding Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery. Additionally, it lists multiple motions filed by Maxwell's defense team on January 25 to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment and request a separate trial.

This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on January 14, 2021, by attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that there are no impediments to MDC staff providing Maxwell with a laptop on weekends and holidays and requests a court order forcing the BOP to grant this access to facilitate the review of 'millions of documents' for her defense.

This document is a court docket sheet covering late 2020 to early 2021 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural motions filed by her attorney, Christian Everdell, including requests for extensions and a Notice of Appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. Notably, it documents a conflict between the court and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) regarding an order granting Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials, which the BOP subsequently requested to be vacated.

This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a docket sheet page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from July 27 to July 30, 2020. It details a dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order siding with the Government, restricting Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims and witnesses to protect their privacy during the criminal proceedings.

This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal proceedings including the filing of multiple motions to dismiss charges and request separate trials, the assignment of an appellate case number (21-0058), and a dispute between the Court and the Bureau of Prisons regarding Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. Attorneys Mark Cohen, Christian Everdell, and Jeffrey Pagliuca are listed as filing documents on Maxwell's behalf.

This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, involving the USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a series of legal filings, primarily letters and motions, entered on July 12, 2022, from both the prosecution (USA) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings, dated from late 2021, cover various pre-trial issues such as witness testimony, expert disclosures, and jury instructions, and the log also notes the deletion of a sealed document that was filed in error.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.

This document is a Notice of Motion to Withdraw filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 1, 2025. Attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen, along with their firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, are requesting to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in case 20 Cr. 330 (PAE). The motion is made pursuant to Local Rule 1.4 and is accompanied by a Declaration from Christian R. Everdell.

This legal document, dated January 5, 2022, is a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It indicates that Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) suggests examining deliberating jurors to evaluate their conduct and is in the process of drafting a Rule 33 motion. The document lists several attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 14, 2021, requesting a court order to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials. The letter notes that the current prison computer lacks necessary software, the volume of discovery is massive ahead of the July 12, 2021 trial, and the government does not object to this request. It also highlights that Maxwell previously had daily access during a quarantine period in late 2020.

This document is a court docket log from the SDNY covering late April and early May 2021 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal skirmishes over Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn, specifically regarding the seizure of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and allegations of sleep deprivation caused by flashlight surveillance every 15 minutes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC and the Government to justify these actions and ensure the confidentiality of attorney-client communications.

This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, with Judge Alison J. Nathan citing her as a clear flight risk and affirming that pretrial detention is warranted. The document also lists specific charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and sex trafficking, and outlines procedures for redactions to protect third-party privacy.

This is a letter motion dated August 10, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense is requesting two court orders: one to compel the government to disclose the identities of 'Victims 1-3' mentioned in the indictment, and another to direct the Bureau of Prisons to move Maxwell to the general population to facilitate access to discovery materials. The document includes a handwritten and stamped order from Judge Nathan dated August 11, 2020, setting a deadline of August 13 for the government's response.

A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays. The letter argues that current restrictions hinder her ability to review voluminous discovery before her July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request and that she previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period.

This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.

This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.

This document is the cover page for a Motion in Limine filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The motion, submitted by Maxwell's defense team, seeks to preclude the prosecution from referring to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims' during the trial. It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell from three different law firms.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail due to flight risk, the listing of specific criminal charges against her (including sex trafficking and perjury), and subsequent procedural motions regarding filing deadlines and a Notice of Appeal. The document records Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders denying bail and denying an extension of time to file an appeal notice.

This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.

This is a Notice of Motion filed on October 13, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys for Maxwell are formally notifying the court and prosecution of their intent to request a specific jury selection process, namely 'individual sequestered juror voir dire and limited counsel-conducted voir dire'. The motion is to be brought before Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This is the signature page (page 31 of 32) of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 9, 2022, and filed on March 11, 2022. The text concludes a motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. It lists the defense counsel team (Pagliuca, Menninger, Everdell, and Sternheim) representing Maxwell.

This document is a court docket summary from March 2021, detailing a series of filings and orders in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell from late 2020. The entries cover procedural matters such as setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, requests to seal documents, and extensive correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A judge denies Maxwell's request to summon the warden but orders the government to provide regular written updates on her status.

This is a legal letter from Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 8, 2021. The defense requests a 30-day extension to appeal the denial of Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The extension is requested to allow the defense time to consider filing a third bail application with more stringent conditions and to review recently produced documents without losing the right to appeal the previous denial.

This document is a page from a court docket covering proceedings between July 7 and July 9, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the official appearances of Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders regarding speedy trial exclusions and victim rights. It also schedules a remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, providing public access dial-in numbers.

This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between July 30, 2020, and August 18, 2020. It includes a detailed ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders and privacy of witnesses, citing it as 'unprecedented' and 'too broad.' The docket entries list various filings, including motions for discovery disclosure by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition responses from the Government (Alex Rossmiller).

This document is a letter motion filed by Christian Everdell, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting a one-week extension (until November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet. The letter explains that the delay is needed due to other pressing deadlines and states that the government consents to the request. Judge Alison J. Nathan signed and ordered the approval of this request on October 26, 2021.

A legal letter dated May 28, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal because it contains confidential discovery information governed by a protective order, allowing the government time to propose redactions before public filing.

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.

This document is the cover page of a legal memorandum filed on February 4, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and orders from August 10 to August 24, 2020. The entries pertain to the case of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and involve motions and responses between her legal team and the prosecution (USA) concerning discovery, protective orders, and requests to file documents under seal or in excess of page limits. The proceedings are overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, who issues orders and sets deadlines for the parties involved.

This document is a court docket report from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 1 to March 23, 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail, various letters exchanged regarding pretrial motions and redactions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sealing of exhibits. It specifically mentions the related civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-7433) in the context of unsealing transcript portions.

This document is a court docket report from July 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). It details the filing of a superseding indictment, notices of appearance by Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), and a Pro Hac Vice motion for attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca. It also includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting a briefing schedule and establishing protocols for a remote arraignment and bail hearing on July 14, 2020, including teleconference access numbers and COVID-19 safety measures for physical attendance.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 27, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Everdell certifies that the defense has conferred with federal prosecutors (Moe, Rossmiller, and Comey) regarding a protective order but remains in dispute regarding restrictions on government witnesses' use of discovery materials.

This document is a court docket log from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, detailing filings from July and August 2021. Key events include letters filed by Maxwell's defense team, a motion to suppress evidence, and a significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan admonishing attorney David Markus for writing an op-ed about the case. The log culminates with the court denying Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions.

This document is a signature page (Page 3 of 4) from a court filing (Document 357) dated October 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense legal team submitting the document, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 covering February 23, 2021, to March 18, 2021. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bond, the Government's opposition to it, and various scheduling orders regarding pretrial motions. A significant order on March 18, 2021, addresses the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically denying the Government's request to completely seal 'Exhibit 11' because portions of the transcript are already public record in the *Giuffre v. Maxwell* civil case.

This is a legal waiver filed on July 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Maxwell, through her attorney Christian R. Everdell, waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, provided she can communicate privately with her counsel. The document is signed by Everdell on behalf of Maxwell and accepted by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

A legal letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery review laptop. The letter argues that current prison computers lack necessary software to review millions of documents before the July 12, 2021 trial, and notes that the government does not object to this request.

This document is a 'Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding' filed in the Southern District of New York on July 14, 2020, for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In the document, signed on July 10, 2020, by her attorney Christian R. Everdell, Maxwell waives her right to appear in person for her arraignment, bail hearing, and conference, citing the COVID-19 pandemic as a reason for the bail hearing waiver.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for a renewed bail application to protect the privacy interests of third parties, notices of transcript filings, and the entry of appearance by attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government. The document also lists the filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of bail accompanied by numerous exhibits (A through X).

This document is page 21 of a defense motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) are requesting the Court order the government to disclose 'bad acts' evidence (Rule 404(b)) by March 12, 2021, a request the government previously denied. The document concludes the legal brief and is signed by Mark S. Cohen.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.

A court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted a motion allowing attorney Christian R. Everdell to withdraw as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell because she had retained new appellate counsel.

This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell between late December 2020 and January 12, 2021. It records Judge Nathan's denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail on the grounds that she remains a flight risk, the filing of sealed documents, and the subsequent denial of a request to extend the time to file an appeal. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal and the transmission of the case to the US Court of Appeals.

This document is a court docket summary from Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021, detailing legal proceedings involving defendant Ghislaine Maxwell from late February to mid-March 2021. It records the filing of Maxwell's third motion for bail, subsequent responses from the U.S. Government (USA), and various letters and motions from both parties regarding pretrial matters and filing deadlines. The document culminates in a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, which addresses disputes over the redaction and sealing of sensitive information in court filings.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from July 9 to July 15, 2020. It details the arraignment held on July 14, 2020, where Maxwell pleaded Not Guilty via video conference due to COVID-19 protocols, and Judge Alison J. Nathan denied bail, remanding Maxwell to custody. The docket also records attorney appearances for the defense (Cohen, Everdell, Pagliuca) and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.

A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.

This document is a court docket report (SDNY) from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, generated in 2023 but detailing events from July and August 2020. It includes the conclusion of a judicial order regarding a protective order for discovery materials, balancing witness privacy against defense needs, and lists subsequent procedural filings including motions and responses between Maxwell's defense team (Everdell) and the Government (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure. The text highlights the Court's decision to adopt the Government's proposed protective order to safeguard witness privacy.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.

This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.

This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing legal activities related to Ghislaine Maxwell between January 12 and January 25, 2021. The entries record the transmission of an appeal, a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for discovery review involving the Bureau of Prisons, and the filing of numerous pretrial motions by her legal team to dismiss various charges. The document highlights the procedural back-and-forth between the defense, the court, and the Bureau of Prisons in the pretrial phase of the case.

This document is a legal docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing court filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 31, 2020, and January 25, 2021. The entries show her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, filing motions for extensions and laptop access, Judge Alison J. Nathan ruling on these motions, and the filing of a notice of appeal. A key point of contention arises when the Bureau of Prisons requests the court to vacate an order that granted Maxwell laptop access for discovery review.

This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail on March 22, 2021, and various orders regarding the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically referencing Exhibit 11 and transcripts from the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The docket also records a subpoena request directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, with the court requiring notice be given to those victims.

This document is a page from a federal court docket (SDNY) regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 14 to December 18, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions for both defense and government filings related to Maxwell's renewed bail application, citing privacy interests and legal precedents like Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. It also records the filing of a Memorandum of Law with numerous exhibits by the defense and the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the prosecution.

This document is a page from the court docket for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), listing entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020. It records the filing of transcripts from a July 2020 conference, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for Maxwell's sealed bail application based on privacy interests and judicial efficiency, and the submission of Maxwell's renewed bail motion with numerous exhibits. Additionally, it notes the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government and the government's subsequent opposition to the bail application.

This document is a page from a federal court docket sheet (Case 21-58) outlining proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between late December 2020 and January 2021. Key events include Judge Alison Nathan denying Maxwell's renewed motion for bail on the grounds that she remains a flight risk, the listing of specific federal charges against her (sex trafficking and perjury), and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by the defense. The document also records procedural motions regarding extensions of time and the sealing of specific documents.

This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.

This document is a court docket sheet from April/May 2021 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several legal filings, including a dispute over an incident at MDC Brooklyn on April 24, 2021, where prison officials alleged Maxwell's attorneys smuggled materials to her during a visit—an allegation the defense denied while requesting video footage of the encounter. Additionally, the docket notes a request for anonymity from a non-party alleged victim of a sexual crime.

This document is the cover page of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" for the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is a log of court entries from December 2020 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing various letters and orders. Key events include communications regarding briefing schedules, requests for sealing documents, a renewed motion for release on bail, and concerns about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York. The Court issued orders setting submission deadlines, addressing sealing requests, and requiring the Government to provide regular updates on Maxwell's conditions, while denying a request to summon the Warden.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a docket sheet from a legal case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It logs court activities from December 10 to December 18, 2020, including the filing of a conference transcript, orders regarding Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's decision to allow redactions based on established legal tests. The entries also note the filing of a letter and memorandum by Maxwell's counsel and a notice of appearance by an attorney for the USA.

This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The document lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from three different law firms based in New York and Colorado.

This is a letter dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys state their intention to file a renewed motion for bail for Ms. Maxwell and request an 'in camera' conference to discuss filing portions of the motion and supporting materials under seal. They argue for sealing to protect sensitive and private information concerning Ms. Maxwell and the third-party sureties (family and friends) supporting her bail application.

This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.

This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 553) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 15, 2021, and filed on December 17, 2021. It serves as the signature page for a letter or motion addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan from the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.

This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple motions by Maxwell's defense team to dismiss charges or separate trials. It also records the transmission of appeal records to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.

This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.

This document is a docket sheet from July 2020 detailing legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, including her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty and was denied bail. It records the appearance of her legal team (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the scheduling of her trial for July 2021, and the judge's orders regarding extrajudicial statements and the rejection of letters from non-parties. The document also lists various filings related to protective orders and discovery deadlines.