Relationship Details

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in November 2020. Sternheim requests Maxwell be moved to an interior cell due to reports that the NYC Dept. of Design & Construction would be shutting off heat and water overnight for repairs. The Assistant US Attorney denies the request, stating that temperatures are being monitored and remain within BOP policy limits, and asserting that Maxwell's current placement is appropriate for safety and security.

This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).

This document is an email dated March 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the chambers of Judge Nathan (NYSD). Sternheim submits an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application under seal, copying other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.

An email thread from August 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and likely MDC or prosecution officials. Sternheim reports a security breach where third parties accessed a Zoom room during privileged attorney-client communication and requests a return to WebEx. The respondent denies a breach occurred, attributing the issue to an internal miscommunication where a secure line was already in use.

An email from attorney Bobbi Sternheim to redacted officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at MDC. The email requests permission for Maxwell to use a laptop for reviewing discovery due to technical limitations of MDC computers and outlines several grievances, including invasive surveillance, freezing cell conditions, removal of bedding, excessive searches, and failure to deliver mail.

An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding urgent issues with legal mail delivery to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim provides USPS tracking evidence showing four items waiting for pickup in Brooklyn and threatens court action if the MDC does not retrieve them. The document includes screenshots of the tracking information and a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, a paralegal.

An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated October 20, 2021, regarding a telephonic court conference scheduled for the following day at noon. Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Ghislaine Maxwell's participation in the conference.

This document is an email chain from November 1-2, 2020, detailing a complaint from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding prison conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges the cell is cold, smells of sewage, has moisture issues, and that Maxwell was denied basic items like a water mug and extra blanket. Government officials investigated and responded internally that temperature checks showed the cell was 71-74 degrees (warmer than the 68-degree target), no moisture or smell was found, and she was provided an extra blanket.

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and likely Bureau of Prisons staff regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-506). Sternheim requests confirmation that arrangements are in place for Maxwell's participation in a telephonic court conference scheduled for October 21 at noon. The recipient confirms that staff has been notified and they are prepared.

An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 1, 2020, addressing the harsh confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim describes the conditions as including cold, moisture, and sewage stench, and notes that Maxwell has been denied a blanket and a cup for water. She compares this treatment unfavorably to her experience with terrorism and capital murder suspects in supermax facilities.

This document is a letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's detention at the MDC. Sternheim argues that Maxwell requires access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery materials because the standard prison computers are technically inadequate, slow, and prone to crashing. The letter also alleges mistreatment of Maxwell by MDC guards, including psychological and physical abuse, and highlights that Maxwell is isolated with no human contact other than guards.

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely BOP) regarding the conditions of Maxwell's confinement in January 2021. Sternheim complains about Maxwell being delivered late to legal calls (VTCs), being ordered to clean toilets without gloves, petty inspections for 'crumbs' on her bed, and intrusive physical searches that increase COVID risks. The prison official responds that delays were due to institutional emergencies and asserts that searches comply with BOP Program Statements.

This document contains a chain of emails from January 15, 2021, involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the refusal of MDC staff to comply with a court order granting Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop for discovery review. Despite Judge Nathan's order issued that same day, an Officer Regan allegedly told Maxwell he 'didn't care' and refused access. Sternheim threatens to notify the Judge of this violation and potential contempt of court.

This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and officials at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn/BOP. Sternheim complains on Dec 26 that Maxwell is freezing, her cell is uninsulated during 32-degree weather, and she was denied a holiday meal and blankets. On Dec 28, a BOP Staff Attorney responds, disputing these claims, stating Maxwell has three blankets, received her meals, and that the cell temperature was measured at 76.5 degrees.

This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. Sternheim complains that Maxwell was deprived of blankets and food, leaving her cold and hungry, while the MDC attorney refutes these claims, stating Maxwell had three blankets, received meals, and the cell temperature was 76.5 degrees.

This document is an email thread from December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim details complaints regarding Maxwell's detention conditions, specifically citing excessive searches, lack of privacy during showers, cold temperatures in her isolation cell due to lack of insulation and body heat from other inmates, and constant surveillance. The thread concludes with the attorneys arranging a phone call to discuss the matter.

This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell (Inmate 02879-509) at the MDC. Sternheim complains that during a visit on Oct 24, HEPA filters were broken in the small visiting room and requests future visits be moved to a larger corner room, noting that officers successfully positioned cameras there despite previous denials. Additionally, Sternheim raises urgent concerns about legal mail sent to the MDC not being picked up by the facility.

An email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and likely prison or government officials. Sternheim complains about conditions during a legal visit (broken HEPA filters), requests use of a larger visiting room, and reports that legal mail sent to the MDC has not been picked up. The recipient acknowledges the concerns and promises to inquire with staff.

This document is an email thread dated October 29, 2021, regarding urgent legal mail issues for inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim complains that the MDC has failed to retrieve four items of legal mail despite them being available for pickup, noting Maxwell hasn't received legal mail in over a week. The response from a redacted official briefly states that mail was picked up that day. The footer reveals involvement from Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.

This document contains an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials from January 2021. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is being targeted, physically mistreated (specifically alleging a guard squeezed her breast during a search), and denied proper food (receiving rotting fruit and meat despite a non-flesh diet). The correspondence references Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody as a reason for heightened concern regarding Maxwell's safety and requests the removal of the current guard team.

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.

This document is an email chain dated October 29, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to prison officials (MDC), complaining that Ghislaine Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week. Sternheim provides four USPS tracking numbers showing legal mail has been 'Available for Pickup' at the Brooklyn post office for days (dating back to Oct 12) without being retrieved by the facility. Sternheim threatens to file an 'order to show cause' requiring the recipients' presence in court if the issue is not resolved immediately.

This document is an email chain from October 2021 detailing complaints by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' or a 'cover-up' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with USPS markings despite being placed in an internal mailbox. Additional complaints include inadequate space and COVID safety during legal visits, denial of requests to see the Warden, and issues with food (receiving meat while on a vegetarian diet) and electricity.

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and Bureau of Prisons officials. Sternheim alleges 'foul play' regarding legal mail that went missing and reappeared with a USPS barcode despite never being mailed externally. She also complains about poor conditions at the MDC, including cramped meeting rooms violating COVID protocols, electricity/water issues, and the prison serving Maxwell a bologna sandwich despite her vegetarian diet.

This document represents an email thread between defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and an official at MDC Brooklyn regarding the confinement status of Ghislaine Maxwell on November 19, 2020. The official informs Sternheim that Maxwell was placed in quarantine (not the SHU) for 14 days after close contact with a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in the suspension of in-person legal visits.

This document is a court docket report from late April 2021 for the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her 'Not Guilty' plea, sets scheduling deadlines for pretrial motions and victim disclosures, and details a dispute where Maxwell's defense (Sternheim) alleges MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan ordered MDC legal counsel to show cause regarding this incident.

A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that the government used suggestive questioning techniques on accusers, specifically citing an instance where a witness named 'Jane' changed her testimony regarding a trip to New York and seeing 'The Lion King' after pressure from AUSA Rossmiller. The defense uses this to justify the necessity of expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and suggestive questioning.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting a motion to dismiss counts one through four of her indictment as time-barred. The defense argues that the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, which extended the statute of limitations, cannot be applied retroactively because Congress explicitly rejected a retroactivity provision. Additionally, the defense contends that the Mann Act offenses charged (enticement to travel and transportation of a minor) do not 'necessarily entail' the sexual abuse of a child, and thus the extended statute of limitations under § 3283 does not apply.

This document is an email thread from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government representatives (including Christian Everdell). Sternheim complains that legal materials (a hard drive and books) sent by the government via FedEx were delivered to the MDC on October 12, 2021, but had not been given to Maxwell as of October 14. The document includes screenshots of FedEx tracking information (Tracking #8166 1429 9130 and #8166 1429 9141) confirming delivery to Brooklyn, NY.

This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.

An email chain from April 2021 discussing the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement. Her attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be allowed to access legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she spent over three hours idle there that morning. The forwarding party indicates they have no objection to this request subject to Marshal approval.

This document is an email chain from September 2, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is formally notifying government officials (likely USANYS) of a breach in attorney-client privilege, stating that during a VTC session the previous day, Maxwell observed suspicious activity on the monitor which was also witnessed by an MDC Case Manager. Sternheim demands an explanation and remediation for this interference with the 'secure' Webex line.

An email chain from June 16, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim lodges a formal complaint regarding conditions affecting her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaints focus on technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and specific allegations of inappropriate, threatening, and mocking behavior by detention guards toward Maxwell.

This document is an email chain from June 16, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate behavior by guards, including 'barking orders' and 'officiousness.' The BOP official responds by explaining VTC storage protocols, noting that Maxwell has declined daily medical care offers, and requesting a photo of ear buds Sternheim wishes to bring in.

An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room impeding attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate and threatening behavior by the guards assigned to Maxwell's detail.

An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (forwarded to USANYS). Sternheim complains about poor VTC quality affecting attorney-client privilege and alleges inappropriate/harassing behavior by guards towards Maxwell. The prison official responds that VTC units are stored for protection, Maxwell must obey orders, and notes that Maxwell consistently declines daily medical care offers.

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government officials (likely BOP/MDC) regarding her conditions of confinement in June 2021. Sternheim alleges that guards are sleep-depriving Maxwell by waking her at 1 AM and 3 AM when she shivers from cold, and subsequently confiscated her blankets. The correspondence also debates the quality of VTC (video) connections for legal preparation and the behavior of guards, which the defense characterizes as hostile and the prosecution characterizes as enforcing orders.

This is page 7 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim dated April 15, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues for a continuance (delay) of the trial due to a second superseding indictment which doubles Maxwell's sentencing exposure, while noting that continued detention prejudices the defendant. It also mentions an upcoming bail appeal hearing at the Second Circuit scheduled for April 26th.

This document is the signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 13, 2021. The text requests the Court to grant individual sequestered voir dire due to the sensitive nature of the charges and pervasive pretrial publicity. The document is signed by attorneys Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.

This document is an email thread between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in 'US v. Maxwell'. The defense advocates strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the Government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense suggests that consenting to bail would resolve the scheduling flexibility issues.

This document is a signature page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated February 24, 2022. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This document is a page from a legal filing, dated January 25, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists contact information for two law firms, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. It lists the legal counsel present for both the government (Moe, Pomerantz, Comey, Rohrbach) and the defense (Sternheim, Everdell), as well as the defendant herself. The judge acknowledges reviewing preparatory documents, including a probation report and defense memoranda, prior to the sentencing.

Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim writes to Judge Alison Nathan objecting to a second superseding indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell just months before the scheduled July 2021 trial. The defense argues this expansion of charges (covering 1994-2004) constitutes tactical gamesmanship and abuse of power, potentially necessitating a delay in the trial. The letter also requests an in-person arraignment and a new bail hearing, citing issues with remote proceedings and referencing Maxwell's difficult detention conditions.

This document is a 'Notice of Appearance' filed on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim formally enters the case as additional counsel for the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that she is serving as co-counsel alongside Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser, LLP.

This document is an email chain from April 2021 between defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and redacted government officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement. Sternheim requests that Maxwell be allowed legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she was held idle for over three hours. The government responds that they do not object but that the US Marshals require a court order.

This document is an email thread from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated March 16, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application, submitted to the Court and government pursuant to legal rules. The email includes Sternheim's contact information and standard confidentiality disclaimers.

This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.

This is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 15, 2021. Sternheim complains that the government's explanation for the severely delayed delivery of Maxwell's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) is inadequate and hinders Maxwell's ability to prepare for trial. The letter argues that the MDC is capable of timely delivery, citing the extensive resources used to monitor Maxwell, and criticizes the government's refusal to facilitate special delivery for evidence.

Legal correspondence from attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding the conditions of confinement for Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. Sternheim complains that HEPA filters were not functioning during a visit on October 25, 2021, necessitating a move to a larger room, and requests that future visits occur in that larger room. Additionally, she provides tracking numbers for legal mail that has been sitting at the post office in Brooklyn without being picked up by the facility.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 11 and February 24, 2022. It details motions for a new trial filed by the defense, communications regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity (specifically Juror 50), and the granting of an amicus curiae brief. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (USA), the defense team (Sternheim, Everdell), and Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This page contains the conclusion and signature block of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document requests that the court vacate Maxwell's conviction and enter a judgment of acquittal. It lists the contact information for her legal defense team, including Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim and her law firm as the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, providing contact addresses and phone numbers in Denver, Colorado, and New York, New York.

An email chain from October 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, demanding immediate confirmation of the status of legal mail at the MDC. Sternheim notes that USPO tracking shows mail available for pickup that the facility has not retrieved, and threatens court action if not resolved. The chain includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell, acting as a paralegal for the Law Offices of Leah Saffian.

This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.

This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.

An email chain from October 29, 2021, regarding urgent issues with Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. Attorney Bobbi Sternheim threatens an order to show cause because Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week despite USPO tracking showing items available for pickup. The document includes a signature block for Isabel Maxwell acting as a paralegal for Leah Saffian, Inc.

This document is a legal docket summary from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, chronicling court filings and orders from February 23 to March 18, 2021. The entries detail the procedural battle over Maxwell's third motion for bail and other pretrial motions, including the setting of deadlines, the granting of extensions, and a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the redaction and sealing of sensitive information in court documents. The log illustrates the ongoing legal maneuvering between Maxwell's defense team and the U.S. Government prosecutors.

This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan, dated November 24, 2020. It details complaints about Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, including harsh quarantine measures after COVID-19 exposure, lack of basic hygiene items like soap and a toothbrush, deletion of legal emails, and sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks every 15 minutes. The letter concludes with a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez, followed by a court order from Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer on the matter.

This document is the signature page (page 65 of 66) of a legal filing (Document 642) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It lists the defense counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Bobbi Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely MDC/BOP). Sternheim complains about the conditions of Maxwell's confinement, specifically alleging that guards repeatedly woke Maxwell due to shivering from cold temperatures only to subsequently confiscate her blankets. The correspondence also addresses technical failures with Video Teleconferencing (VTC) equipment hindering attorney-client preparation and alleges unprofessional behavior by guards.

This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.

This document is an email chain initiated by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to prison officials (MDC) and forwarded to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Sternheim alleges that Maxwell was physically mistreated during a body search, specifically claiming a guard groped her breast, while another threatened her with assault charges. The letter explicitly links the BOP's handling of Maxwell to the negligence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the MCC.

Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.

This document is an email chain from November 5, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP officials. Sternheim acknowledges that Maxwell is now allowed a water mug and snacks but requests she be moved to an interior cell at MDC Brooklyn due to moisture and cold air degrading her legal paperwork and affecting her health. BOP officials circulate the request internally to schedule a discussion.

This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing legal disputes regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn. Key issues include the seizure/confiscation of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and complaints regarding sleep deprivation caused by 15-minute flashlight surveillance checks. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC to account for the seized items, ensure confidentiality of attorney-client materials, and justify the frequency of flashlight checks.

This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell on April 13, 2021. Sternheim inquires if the recipient can persuade the Marshal to allow Maxwell access to legal materials while in the cell block, noting that Maxwell sat idle for over three hours that morning. Sternheim suggests she may seek a Court order if the issue cannot be resolved.

This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP officials regarding legal access at the MDC. Sternheim requests permission to hand-deliver time-sensitive legal documents due to postal delays ahead of a January 25th filing deadline. The BOP official denies the request, citing policies requiring standard mail processing and a ban on visitors (likely due to COVID-19 protocols). The emails also confirm a schedule for Video Teleconferences (VTCs) for the week.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.

This document is a page from the court docket for *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (dated November 9, 2021). It contains orders from Judge Alison Nathan regarding the logistics of *voir dire* (jury selection), including the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and schedules a sealed *in camera* hearing regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence). Additionally, it logs letters from the defense regarding bond release and from the prosecution regarding victim notification.

This document is an email thread from November 2020 involving Bobbi C. Sternheim, defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim writes to BOP officials stating that Maxwell (Inmate 02879-509) has been placed in quarantine after contact with a COVID-infected corrections officer. Sternheim requests that previously scheduled in-person legal visits for November 21 and November 28 be converted to legal calls to discuss time-sensitive matters.

This document is an email chain from November 2020 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim writes to unidentified recipients (likely prison officials) seeking confirmation and explanation regarding Maxwell receiving a Covid-19 nasal swab and being moved to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for a 14-day quarantine, expressing concern over scheduled legal calls and visits.

This document is an email chain from October 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell case. It discusses a filing by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and a subsequent endorsement by Judge Nathan regarding the delay of legal mail for Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as GM). The judge expressed a 'firm expectation' that the defendant receive legal mail within one business day.

This document is an email thread from May 7, 2021, originating from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (Reply to Dkt 270) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) to prosecutors (redacted) and cc's fellow defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally by a redacted sender.

This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It logs the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the placement of several sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim for the defense. The docket details a series of legal correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a judge's order regarding Brady disclosure obligations.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions granted for discovery deadlines, and disputes regarding the timing of evidence disclosure. Significant attention is paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, with Judge Nathan ordering the parties to confer with Warden Heriberto Tellez regarding the defendant's concerns.

This document is an email thread from October 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and MDC officials. Sternheim raises concerns about non-functioning HEPA filters during attorney visits, requests the use of a larger corner room for future visits, and complains about delays in legal mail pickup. The final response from the facility confirms that the legal mail in question was picked up and delivered to Maxwell on the 15th and 18th of the month.

An email chain from October 12, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs recipients (likely MDC officials) that the government has sent a hard drive to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ghislaine Maxwell via Federal Express. Sternheim emphasizes that the hard drive must be given to Maxwell immediately upon arrival as time is of the essence.

This document is an email thread from November 18, 2020, involving attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is inquiring about her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly received a Covid-19 nasal swab and was placed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for a 14-day quarantine. Sternheim is seeking confirmation on whether scheduled legal calls and in-person visits will proceed despite the quarantine.

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Bobbi C. Sternheim, filed on February 1, 2021. It details severe technical difficulties Maxwell faces in reviewing terabytes of discovery material at the MDC, including frequent computer crashes, slow processing, and damaged hard drives allegedly mishandled by staff. The filing also alleges that Maxwell is subjected to stricter isolation than other inmates, physical and psychological abuse by guards, and reprisals for reporting mistreatment.

This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 31, 2021, to April 14, 2021. It details procedural events including the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment, the granting of Pro Hac Vice status to attorney Sigrid McCawley, and various letter motions regarding MDC conditions and subpoenas. It also includes a specific denial by Judge Nathan regarding a request for Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing US Marshal policy.

A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter raises concerns about Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically sleep deprivation caused by guards checking her with flashlights every 15 minutes. It also reports a recent incident where Maxwell developed a 'black eye' of unknown origin, leading to threats of punishment (SHU) by MDC staff if she did not explain the injury.

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is page 2 of a legal letter filed on March 2, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The defense attorneys request that Maxwell's lawyers be present for an upcoming proceeding and ask for a continuance until May. The letter is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and lists co-counsel Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is page 4 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated April 15, 2021, regarding the defense of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the defense needs significant time to review discovery material due to the immense volume (214,000 photos, 250,000 non-searchable documents) and the filing of a superseding indictment adding 'Accuser-4' and expanding the timeframe to the 2000s. It also notes technical difficulties experienced with an FBI-supplied laptop while attempting to review 2,100 'Highly Confidential' photographs with Ms. Maxwell.

This document is the signature page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing from February 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense team, including attorneys Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, and Sternheim, is requesting the court to vacate Maxwell's conviction, dismiss the S2 Indictment, and enter a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 based on insufficient government proof.

This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.

This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from May 3 to May 7, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 to allow the defense to prepare for new charges, orders ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives at the MDC, and various correspondences regarding subpoena requests and 'flashlight security checks' at the detention center. It also notes a deleted document that was filed incorrectly.

This legal filing from December 2020 outlines complaints regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. The defense argues she is being deprived of communication with family and legal counsel, citing specific issues such as deleted legal emails, physical barriers during visits, denial of basic needs during meetings, and the intentional damaging of a hard drive by an officer. The document concludes that these restrictions are arbitrary and disproportionate, noting Maxwell's good behavior and certifications as a suicide counselor and teacher.

This legal document, filed on March 2, 2022, is a request from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, led by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, ask the Court to postpone an important proceeding until a convenient date in May. The reason for the request is to ensure that Ms. Maxwell's lawyers can be present for the matter.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 394) from the court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell from three law firms: Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; Cohen & Gresser LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This document is a page from a court docket report (Case 22-1426) dated June 2022, detailing procedural orders leading up to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders establishing strict protocols for victim impact statements, including deadlines for submission and objections, and prohibits electronic devices in the courtroom. It also notes letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and attorney Robert Lewis, and issues a correction regarding the contact information for Victim Witness Unit Coordinator Wendy Olsen.

This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.

This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 7, 2020. The letter argues that Maxwell is facing unduly harsh conditions, including solitary isolation, as a result of the Bureau of Prisons' incompetence and embarrassment over Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is an 'exemplary detainee' and calls for Warden Tellez to address the concerns regarding her confinement, which are allegedly interfering with her legal defense.

This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.

This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

A legal letter dated March 31, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to a second superseding indictment filed by the government, characterizing it as 'tactical gamesmanship' that expands the conspiracy timeline (1994-2004) and adds charges based on old evidence against Jeffrey Epstein. Sternheim expresses concern over Maxwell's health and ability to stand trial, notes the government's refusal to provide accuser names, and requests a conference to discuss moving the July 12th trial date.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions,' filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell: Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010267.

This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.

A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's request to finalize jury selection on November 19, preferring November 29 to account for potential COVID-19 exposure and biases arising during the Thanksgiving holiday break. The document highlights procedural disagreements between the defense and the government regarding trial scheduling.

This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.

This document is a page from the court docket (SDNY CM/ECF) for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It records defense motions for a Bill of Particulars and a Third Motion for Bond, as well as multiple sealed documents and correspondence regarding MDC confinement conditions. The document also includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling responses for the bond motion and granting an extension for defense replies.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.

This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 125) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. It serves as the signature or counsel identification page, listing Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. and Bobbi C. Sternheim as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details grievances including the persistence of mail delays (specifically a FedEx package with a discovery disc), the serving of moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and the deletion of legal emails via CorrLinks. The filing argues that Maxwell is in 'de facto solitary confinement' and lacks adequate computer resources to review discovery for her trial.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.

This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a Memorandum of Law, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 13, 2021. It is filed by the legal team for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion seeks an individual and sequestered jury selection process (voir dire) to be partially conducted by the defense counsel.

A legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan regarding 'Juror 50.' The letter notes that Juror 50 intends to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, despite publicly claiming honesty, and that the government is seeking immunity for the juror. Maxwell's defense requests an explanation (proffer) for the Fifth Amendment assertion and the government's willingness to grant immunity.

This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document represents a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 3, 2022. The entries focus heavily on post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50', who was scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2022. Key developments include Juror 50's attorney notifying the court that the juror intended to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Government's subsequent notification that they were seeking approval to compel the juror's testimony via immunity orders (18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003).

This document is a court docket sheet from early 2021 (Jan 26 - Feb 4) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details various filings including letters regarding redactions and laptop access at the MDC, and significant defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss multiple counts of the indictment. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders regarding redaction timelines and denied a request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate a previous order.

This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).

This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 145) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the contact information for the law firms Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is the first page of a court record for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the appearances for the trial held on December 1, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, listing the presiding judge, legal teams for both the prosecution and defense, and other law enforcement and paralegal personnel present.

This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.

This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.

Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan on May 10, 2022, requesting a two-day extension for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing submission due to a pre-existing travel commitment. Although the government consented to the request, Judge Nathan explicitly denied the extension via an order stamped on the document dated May 11, 2022. The sentencing remained scheduled for June 28, 2022.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.

This is page 3 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document alleges that the MDC violated HIPAA by releasing Maxwell's medical info, describes her deteriorating physical condition (failing eyesight, thinning hair), and details an incident where she was physically abused (shoved) by a guard while being moved to an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government claims exists but the defense believes was not recorded.

This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case on April 1, 2022. The letter informs the court of a new Paramount Plus interview with 'Juror 50' that promises a 'bombshell revelation,' which may impact Maxwell's pending motion for a new trial. Sternheim requests a stay of any ruling until the defense and court can review the content of this interview.

This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.

This legal document, dated January 5, 2022, is a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It indicates that Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) suggests examining deliberating jurors to evaluate their conduct and is in the process of drafting a Rule 33 motion. The document lists several attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.

This document is a court docket log from the SDNY covering late April and early May 2021 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal skirmishes over Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC Brooklyn, specifically regarding the seizure of her legal materials by prison staff on April 24, 2021, and allegations of sleep deprivation caused by flashlight surveillance every 15 minutes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring the MDC and the Government to justify these actions and ensure the confidentiality of attorney-client communications.

This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.

This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.

This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.

This document is the cover page for a Motion in Limine filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The motion, submitted by Maxwell's defense team, seeks to preclude the prosecution from referring to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims' during the trial. It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell from three different law firms.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter details severe sanitary issues including mold, vermin, and undrinkable tap water, as well as restrictive legal visitation conditions that impede attorney-client privilege. It also notes Maxwell's deteriorating health and lack of access to fresh air for eight months.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details procedural battles regarding the redaction of sensitive information in pre-trial motions and disputes over Maxwell's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn detention center. The defense filed multiple significant motions on February 4, 2021, including motions to suppress evidence from a subpoena to a redacted party and motions to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on pre-indictment delay and arguments that alleged misstatements were not perjurious.

This is a Notice of Motion filed on October 13, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys for Maxwell are formally notifying the court and prosecution of their intent to request a specific jury selection process, namely 'individual sequestered juror voir dire and limited counsel-conducted voir dire'. The motion is to be brought before Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This is the signature page (page 31 of 32) of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 9, 2022, and filed on March 11, 2022. The text concludes a motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. It lists the defense counsel team (Pagliuca, Menninger, Everdell, and Sternheim) representing Maxwell.

This document is a court docket summary from March 2021, detailing a series of filings and orders in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell from late 2020. The entries cover procedural matters such as setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, requests to seal documents, and extensive correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A judge denies Maxwell's request to summon the warden but orders the government to provide regular written updates on her status.

This document is a docket sheet from a legal case, detailing a series of court filings in February 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell. On February 4, 2021, Maxwell's defense team filed numerous motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various charges from the superseding indictment. The log also records subsequent sealed filings and letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's pretrial confinement conditions.

This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.

This is a letter dated October 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Warden Heriberto Tellez of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The attorney is writing on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to protest the 'extraordinarily restrictive conditions' of her detention, which are compared to solitary confinement and death row. The letter argues that these harsh measures are not a response to any threat Maxwell poses but are an overreaction by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to its failure to prevent the death of Jeffrey Epstein at a different facility.

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC East Building. The text details unsanitary conditions involving mold and vermin, inadequate facilities for legal counsel meetings (described as a 'fishbowl' and 'death trap'), and Maxwell's deteriorating health due to lack of fresh air and sunlight over eight months. It also notes that a request for a legal call regarding pretrial motions was denied.

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.

This document is the cover page of a legal memorandum filed on February 4, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.

A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter refutes the government's claims about Maxwell's detention conditions, arguing they are overly restrictive and punitive. It details unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically a recent incident involving a severe sewage stench, overflowing toilets from the floor above, and plumbing issues in Maxwell's isolation cell.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from November 13 to November 15, 2021. It details procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire logistics (including COVID protocols), the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a sealed document. It also lists correspondence from both the prosecution (regarding exhibits) and the defense (regarding late disclosures to the MDC).

This document is a legal letter dated October 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense accepts the Court's draft preliminary remarks for jurors but strongly objects to the government's request to delay providing the names of prospective jurors until the start of oral voir dire on November 16, 2021. Sternheim argues that the Court previously determined names would be provided with questionnaires and requests the Court deny the government's attempt to delay disclosure.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It details various legal maneuvers, including Maxwell's third motion for bond, motions for a bill of particulars, and disputes regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The docket also records correspondence between the defense (Cohen, Sternheim, Everdell) and the prosecution (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, as well as the sealing of multiple documents.

This document is a court docket report from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 1 to March 23, 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail, various letters exchanged regarding pretrial motions and redactions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sealing of exhibits. It specifically mentions the related civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-7433) in the context of unsealing transcript portions.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between March 31, 2021, and April 14, 2021. Key events include the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment to April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The document also details a denial by Judge Nathan of a defense request to allow Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing U.S. Marshal policy.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.

This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering filings and orders on November 8 and 9, 2021. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's renewed request for bail, motions to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) motions. The document also addresses logistical issues such as the delivery of legal mail to the MDC and humane transport protocols for the defendant.

This document is a section of a court docket from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from April 7, 2021, to April 16, 2021. It details procedural events including the rescheduling of an arraignment on a superseding indictment, the denial of a request regarding materials in courthouse cellblocks due to US Marshal policy, and a motion to continue the trial date. The document also includes judicial orders regarding redactions and the unsealing of specific legal memorandums.

This document is a court docket log from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, detailing filings from July and August 2021. Key events include letters filed by Maxwell's defense team, a motion to suppress evidence, and a significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan admonishing attorney David Markus for writing an op-ed about the case. The log culminates with the court denying Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions.

This document is a signature page (Page 3 of 4) from a court filing (Document 357) dated October 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense legal team submitting the document, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

This legal document is a declaration by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated July 15, 2022, filed in Case 22-1426. Sternheim states that she represented Ghislaine Maxwell through her district court trial and sentencing but has not been retained for the appeal. She informs the court that new counsel, Hon. John M. Leventhal of Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, PC, has been retained and formally requests to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell's appeal.

This is a legal letter dated April 7, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a government filing from the previous day and complains about unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically detailing a 'pervasive stench of sewage' in Maxwell's isolation unit caused by unused drains and overflowing toilets from the cellblock above.

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The text alleges severe mistreatment by prison staff, including physical abuse, withholding of food, destruction of legal documents, and excessive surveillance (including filming her showers). It also argues against flight risk allegations by citing monitored calls that demonstrate Maxwell's strong ties to the United States and desire to clear her name.

This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed by her attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, it declares Maxwell's intent to appeal the judgment, conviction, and sentence entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.

This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 15, 2022, regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The order grants a motion by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell because Maxwell has retained new counsel for her appeal. The document is signed by the Clerk of Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe.

This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.

This legal document is a letter dated February 24, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves as a response to a court order issued the same day, proposing that the defense will make limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order that was filed under a temporary seal.

This document is page 4 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It details complaints including delayed mail, unreadable discovery discs, moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and 'de facto solitary confinement.' The filing also argues that inadequate computer equipment is hindering Maxwell's ability to prepare for trial given the massive amount of discovery documents.

This legal letter, sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, formally complains about Maxwell's harsh and restrictive conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter refutes a previous communication from MDC staff, detailing issues such as significant weight loss, isolation, constant surveillance, and a recent quarantine that hindered her defense preparation. Sternheim renews the request for the MDC Warden, Heriberto Tellez, to respond directly to the Court and justify these conditions.

This document is a court docket summary from Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021, detailing legal proceedings involving defendant Ghislaine Maxwell from late February to mid-March 2021. It records the filing of Maxwell's third motion for bail, subsequent responses from the U.S. Government (USA), and various letters and motions from both parties regarding pretrial matters and filing deadlines. The document culminates in a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, which addresses disputes over the redaction and sealing of sensitive information in court filings.

This is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 346) from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues that incompetence at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) is hindering Maxwell's ability to review vital trial materials and prepare for her defense. Sternheim characterizes the detention conditions as 'extraordinary and onerous' for a nearly 60-year-old non-violent detainee and warns that inaction may erode constitutional rights and delay the trial.

This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It identifies Laura A. Menninger and Bobbi C. Sternheim as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The document provides the names, law firms, addresses, and phone numbers for both attorneys.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.

This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details entries from November 15, 2021, including logistics for public/press access to the courtroom, the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a dispute regarding the late receipt of government disclosures at the MDC. It concludes with a minute entry for a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present with her defense team and the government prosecutors.

This is the second page of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 24, 2020. The letter complains to the Court about the harsh conditions of Maxwell's pretrial detention at the MDC, describing them as worse than those for terrorists at ADMAX, citing sleep deprivation via flashlight checks every 15 minutes, excessive surveillance, and isolation. Sternheim requests that Warden Heriberto Tellez be summoned to report directly to the Court regarding these conditions and notes the difficulty Maxwell faces in reviewing 1.2 million discovery documents under her current restrictions.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings, including discovery deadline extensions, an affidavit from AUSA Maurene Comey, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Notably, it includes orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically ordering parties to confer regarding Warden Heriberto Tellez addressing her concerns.

A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes government claims about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, highlighting excessive physical searches (approx. 1400 times), lack of legal access, and intense surveillance measures. Sternheim explicitly links these harsh conditions to BOP negligence surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering June 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's bail appeal by the Second Circuit, her complaints regarding sleep deprivation at the MDC, and the denial of her motions to suppress evidence. It also orders the unsealing of documents related to the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell.

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.

This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.

A letter dated October 14, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order to compel the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to deliver legal mail to Ghislaine Maxwell within 24 hours of receipt. Sternheim details specific incidents of delay, including a hard drive withheld for two days and legal mail deposited on October 2 that was not discovered until October 7. The letter also alleges potential evidence tampering, noting a 'questionable bar code sticker' found on legal mail that the MDC Unit Manager eventually returned to counsel.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021. It details the start of the jury trial on November 29, 2021, various filings regarding jury instructions and expert testimony (Dr. Ryan Hall), and orders related to materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The document also notes a court order granting a government request to seal filings to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.

This is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on July 7, 2022, in the Southern District of New York for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell is appealing her conviction and sentence (judgment entered June 29, 2022) to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals following a guilty verdict at trial. The document identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim as her counsel for the filing of this notice only, noting she is not retained for the appeal itself, and identifies Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.

This document is a letter dated February 1, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues against the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) objection to allowing Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery documents. The letter asserts that the MDC's proposed alternative, a prison computer, is inadequate for the task and that the MDC has failed to provide a valid security or staffing reason for restricting laptop access, thereby impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense.

This document is the cover page of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" for the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is a log of court entries from December 2020 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing various letters and orders. Key events include communications regarding briefing schedules, requests for sealing documents, a renewed motion for release on bail, and concerns about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York. The Court issued orders setting submission deadlines, addressing sealing requests, and requiring the Government to provide regular updates on Maxwell's conditions, while denying a request to summon the Warden.

This document is a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim dated June 15, 2021, detailing complaints regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It outlines specific incidents of alleged harassment and obstruction by prison guards, including the reading of privileged legal materials, denial of water, excessive monitoring during legal visits, and technical interference with video conferencing that compromises attorney-client privilege.

This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The document lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from three different law firms based in New York and Colorado.

This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.

This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 553) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 15, 2021, and filed on December 17, 2021. It serves as the signature page for a letter or motion addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan from the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.

A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes the government's portrayal of her confinement, alleging mistreatment including the deletion of legal emails, lack of hygiene supplies during quarantine, unauthorized photography of her cell, and lack of medical communication regarding COVID-19 exposure.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from January 14, 2022, to January 26, 2022. Key events include Judge Nathan scheduling Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and granting an exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act until April 2022 to allow for post-trial motions. The docket also records various letters from media organizations (Miami Herald, ABC, NBC, NY Times) regarding the unsealing of documents related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.

This document is a legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on November 24, 2020, regarding the pretrial detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The defense alleges excessive surveillance, sleep deprivation via flashlight checks every 15 minutes, and isolation, requesting that Warden Heriberto Tellez be summoned to address the court. The document includes a hand-signed order by Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer regarding the request for the Warden to address these concerns.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.

A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 24, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter details harsh detention conditions at the MDC, including Maxwell being quarantined due to COVID-19 exposure from a staff member, deletion of attorney-client emails, lack of hygiene supplies (soap/toothbrush), unauthorized photography of her cell, and the cancellation of legal visits without notice.