Dialogue regarding the handling of evidence during the deposition.
Simpson questions the witness; Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer. Simpson addresses Scarola as 'Jack'.
Scarola interjects to clarify Simpson's question.
Argumentative dialogue regarding procedural conduct.
Discussing objections and motions to strike during the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021918.jpg
A page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola, and a witness. The discussion centers on the introduction of a one-page document (partially typed with handwriting) into evidence, which is subsequently marked for identification as 'Cassell Exhibit 3'. The witness mentions a timeline involving 'December 30th'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021879.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving an interrogation by Mr. Simpson. The questioning focuses on establishing the factual basis for allegations concerning 'other minors' known by the witness as of December 30, 2014. Attorney Mr. Scarola interrupts to instruct the witness not to answer based on privilege, leading to a debate about separating privileged legal strategy from non-privileged factual information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021852.jpg
This document is page 29 of a rough draft legal transcript (Bates stamped House Oversight). A witness discusses the difficulty of investigating Jeffrey Epstein's crimes due to a lack of cooperation and the inability to identify the names of the girls he trafficked. Attorneys Mr. Simpson and Mr. Scarola discuss procedural objections regarding the witness's answer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
This document is page 122 of a rough draft transcript from a legal deposition, likely related to a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness (a former prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia) about the admissibility of a third party's Fifth Amendment invocation as evidence in criminal versus civil cases. Mr. Scarola is also present as counsel. The witness discusses their experience with approximately 20 trials involving drug dealers and gun runners but cannot recall specific instances of using the Fifth Amendment in the manner described.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021893.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (page 70) marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It records a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Mr. Simpson regarding the conduct of Alan Dershowitz. Scarola complains that Dershowitz has been repeatedly 'jumping up' during testimony over the last two days, while Simpson attempts to downplay the disruptions, stating he only saw Dershowitz approach him once.
Entities connected to both MR. SCAROLA and Mr. Simpson
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship