Relationship Details

This document is page 124 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The witness, advised by attorney Mr. Scarola to invoke common interest privilege, refuses to answer whether their legal team communicated with Mr. Josefsburg. The testimony discusses a complaint signed by Josefsburg using the term 'academicians,' which the witness interprets as evidence against Alan Dershowitz, noting that a partner in Josefsburg's firm subsequently questioned Dershowitz about a sex abuse matter.

This document is page 64 of a rough draft legal transcript, likely from a House Oversight Committee investigation given the Bates stamp. It features an exchange between attorneys Mr. Simpson and Mr. Scarola, and an unnamed witness. The witness denies that Professor Dershowitz abused other minors, and the ensuing dialogue concerns the procedural rules for the witness referring to notes and documents to refresh their recollection versus testifying from memory.

This document is page 14 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness, initially instructing them to look at the camera for the benefit of a future jury, a point clarified by the witness's counsel, Mr. Scarola. The questioning then pivots to the 'scope of investigation,' specifically asking if serious misconduct allegations require more investigation than lesser allegations, to which the witness agrees.