The deponent is questioned about 'your friend' in relation to a name tag incident.
The deponent is questioned about 'your friend' in relation to a name tag incident.
The deponent is questioned about 'your friend' in relation to a name tag incident.
The deponent is asked about '[REDACTED] your friend at the [REDACTED] right?' and confirms the person is their friend.
The deponent is questioned about 'your friend' in relation to a name tag incident.
The deponent is questioned about 'your friend' in relation to a name tag incident.
The deponent wrote a message to their 'friend' about the deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033009.jpg
This document is page 21 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness who admits to sending a message to a friend calling the deposition 'stupid court s-h-i-t'. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012442.jpg
This document is page 47 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. The witness denies asking co-workers to lie and refutes an accusation about getting a friend to switch name tags, claiming the situation was a coincidence. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Mr. Leopold, and a discussion about marking photographic exhibits for the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
Entities connected to both Unnamed Deponent and Unnamed friend
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship