Relationship Details

MR. LEOPOLD Client Unnamed Deponent

Connected Entities

Entity A
MR. LEOPOLD
Type: person
Mentions: 318
Also known as: MR. LEOPOLD and MR. GOLDBERGER
Entity B
Unnamed Deponent
Type: person
Mentions: 24
Also known as: Unnamed Deponent (Plaintiff)

Evidence

Mr. Leopold represents the deponent in the deposition, makes objections, and provides instruction ("do not answer the question").

Mr. Leopold represents the deponent in the deposition and makes an objection on her behalf.

Mr. Leopold represents the deponent during the deposition, objects on their behalf, and asserts attorney-client privilege.

The question on lines 3-5 asks if the deponent or their parents spoke to any law firms 'besides Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold's law firms'.

Source Documents (4)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012406.jpg

Deposition Transcript • 970 KB
View

This document is page 11 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein by attorney Jeffrey Herman. The deponent's counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects but the deponent ultimately confirms their awareness of the lawsuit.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012436.jpg

Deposition Transcript • 697 KB
View

This document is page 41 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is questioned about their lawyer, Mr. Herman. The witness clarifies that their father, not them, selected Mr. Herman, and they met him once at a friend's house with their aunt present. An attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to further questions about the meeting, successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012405.jpg

Deposition Transcript • 920 KB
View

This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, about their awareness of a lawsuit filed on their behalf by lawyer Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing attorney-client privilege, leading to a dispute over the validity of the privilege claim.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012471.jpg

deposition transcript • 809 KB
View

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both MR. LEOPOLD and Unnamed Deponent

MR. TEIN (person)
Jeffrey Epstein (person)

MR. LEOPOLD's Other Relationships

Client Unnamed Client/Witness
Strength: 10/10 View
Business associate MR. GOLDBERGER
Strength: 10/10 View
Client Saige
Strength: 10/10 View
Adversarial counsel MR. TEIN
Strength: 10/10 View
Adversarial opposing counsel MR. TEIN
Strength: 10/10 View

Unnamed Deponent's Other Relationships

Friend Unnamed friend
Strength: 10/10 View
Employee Unnamed Boss
Strength: 9/10 View
Client Mr. Herman
Strength: 6/10 View
Client Jeffrey Herman
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Jeffrey Epstein
Strength: 5/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Client
Relationship Strength
8/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
4
Extracted
2025-11-17 04:09
Last Updated
2025-11-17 06:29

Entity Network Stats

MR. LEOPOLD 48 relationships
Unnamed Deponent 20 relationships
Mutual connections 2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship