Relationship Details

This document page is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the period between 2000 and 2002, covering the end of Espinosa's employment. Espinosa testifies that by this time, the romantic relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared to be over, though Maxwell continued to work for Epstein in the same role, despite rarely coming into the office towards the end of that period.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about the office layout being a shared open space and confirms that Ghislaine (Maxwell) did not have a private office. The witness also discusses signing a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) to protect Jeffrey Epstein's privacy and client list, noting that signing such agreements was standard practice in their work as an executive assistant for other CEOs.

This document is page 47 of a court transcript featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about the properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein at the start of their employment (Zorro Ranch, 9 East 71st St, El Brillo) and subsequent acquisitions, specifically a Paris apartment and Little Saint James island. The witness notes that the island's name was changed to 'Little Saint Jeffs' and describes the preparation of the island as a 'humongous project' involving themselves and Ghislaine.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about Epstein's generosity, noting that he paid for employees' children's education, provided personal trainers, and gave a watch as a departure gift. The witness also mentions Epstein giving them a massage personally and recounts a period where Epstein, due to a friendship with the producer, sent many people to see 'The Lion King' on Broadway.

This document is page 40 of a court transcript from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness named Espinosa identifies Ghislaine Maxwell in the courtroom and testifies about her six-year employment with Jeffrey Epstein's company. Espinosa states she primarily worked at the office located at 457 Madison in Manhattan, but occasionally worked at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence toward the end of her employment, totaling about one or two weeks over six years. She explicitly denies ever working out of Epstein's Manhattan residence.

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony details the physical layout of Jeffrey Epstein's Madison Avenue office, specifically noting the proximity of Epstein's corner office to his assistant and the witness. The witness confirms sharing an office (referred to as 'Ghislaine's office') with Ghislaine [Maxwell] and a legal assistant identified as Lauren Quitner.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that visits occurred behind closed doors. The questioning specifically focuses on Celina Midelfart, revealing the witness was tasked with sending her flowers (specifically orchids) on Epstein's behalf. The page ends with an overruled objection regarding whether the witness perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart.

This page of court testimony features the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa describes guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that doors were usually shut during visits. The questioning focuses on Celina Midelfart, confirming that Espinosa was tasked with sending her flowers, specifically orchids and bouquets. The page ends with the prosecution asking if Espinosa perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart, which draws an objection from defense attorney Ms. Pomerantz that is overruled by the court.

This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa describes a unique hiring process involving a preliminary interview with Ghislaine Maxwell conducted in the back of a limousine driving around Manhattan. Following this successful 'test,' Espinosa was permitted to meet with Jeffrey Epstein at his office for a final interview and subsequently received a job offer.