Relationship Details

Judge Professional Counsel

Connected Entities

Entity A
Judge
Type: person
Mentions: 227
Also known as: Judge Johnson
Entity B
Counsel
Type: person
Mentions: 172
Also known as: Plaintiffs' Counsel, Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell), Special Counsel, Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel, Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, All Counsel, Counsel General (South African), Counsel General, Nine victims who had previously retained counsel, legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”), Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel, Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)

Evidence

The judge describes interactions with counsel, such as sidebar conferences and ruling on their objections, as part of the legal process.

The judge describes having discussions and sidebar conferences with counsel regarding rulings of law.

The judge holds a private conference at the side bar with counsel to discuss matters related to the case.

The judge holds a private conference at the side bar with counsel to discuss matters related to the case.

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00008787.jpg

Unknown type • 506 KB
View

This legal document is an excerpt of a judge's final instructions to a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the procedural requirements for reaching a unanimous verdict, communicating the verdict to the court via the marshal, and maintaining courtesy and respect during deliberations. The judge also informs the jury of a brief pause for a side bar conference with counsel and the reporter before the case is officially submitted to them.

DOJ-OGR-00014588.jpg

Unknown type • 636 KB
View

This document is a page from a jury charge in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge is instructing the jury on how to properly interpret courtroom proceedings, specifically warning them not to draw inferences from lawyers' objections, the judge's rulings, or sidebar discussions. The judge emphasizes that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that they are the sole determiners of fact.

DOJ-OGR-00017209.jpg

Legal Document • 635 KB
View

This document is a page from a judge's charge to the jury in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. The judge instructs the jury not to be swayed by lawyers' objections or the judge's own rulings and comments, emphasizing that these are matters of legal procedure. The judge stresses that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that statements from counsel are not evidence.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both Judge and Counsel

Jury (person)
defendant (person)
Ms. Maxwell (person)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL (person)

Judge's Other Relationships

Professional Jury
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Ms. Sternheim
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Mr. Shechtman
Strength: 8/10 View
Legal representative Jury
Strength: 8/10 View
Judicial instruction Jury
Strength: 7/10 View

Counsel's Other Relationships

Professional Ms. Maxwell
Strength: 7/10 View
Client Juror 50
Strength: 7/10 View
Client Ms. Maxwell
Strength: 7/10 View
Professional defendant
Strength: 6/10 View
Client GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 6/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
8/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:46
Last Updated
2025-11-20 16:54

Entity Network Stats

Judge 37 relationships
Counsel 34 relationships
Mutual connections 4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship