Rodgers maintained a logbook for flights on "Epstein's planes," suggesting Rodgers was a pilot or crew member for Epstein.
Rodgers was contacted by Epstein's office to schedule flights, indicating an employment or contractor relationship.
Rodgers flew flights for Epstein, as stated in line 10: 'about the flights you flew for Epstein'.
Rodgers' testimony indicates he was familiar with the procedures for logging passengers on Epstein's plane.
Rodgers' testimony indicates he was familiar with the procedures for logging passengers on Epstein's plane.
Rodgers flew "thousand-plus flights" for Epstein from 1994 to 2004.
Rodgers sent flight manifests to Epstein's office on a monthly basis.
Rodgers sent flight manifests to Epstein's office on a monthly basis.
Rodgers is being questioned about Epstein's flight logs, indicating a role with knowledge of or access to these records.
Rodgers was responsible for or familiar with the logbooks for 'Epstein's planes', suggesting an employment or professional connection.
Rodgers was a pilot who worked within Epstein's organization, as he reported to and had his expenses approved by Epstein's 'number 2'.
The document indicates Rodgers was a pilot on flights for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019093.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning confirms that an individual named Emmy was a passenger on one of Epstein's planes. The transcript also establishes that, according to the witness's recollection and the flight logs, there is no record of a person named Annie Farmer ever flying on Epstein's planes.
DOJ-OGR-00019051.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00019049.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that their practice for keeping flight logbooks on Epstein's planes was to use initials for frequent passengers they recognized, such as 'SK', in order to save space. This establishes that initials in the logbook signify a recognized, repeat passenger.
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on whether Rodgers, a pilot, ever saw females who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 on flights he piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004, and also after 2004. Rodgers denies seeing any such individuals and confirms his recollection that a woman referred to as "Jane" appeared to be at least 18 when he met her.
DOJ-OGR-00013466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers confirms the procedures for logging passengers on a plane associated with Epstein, stating that frequent passengers like Sarah Kellen were abbreviated by initials, while new passengers' full names were used. He also affirms that Epstein's friends, acquaintances, and family would fly on the plane with him, sometimes just for a 'lift'.
DOJ-OGR-00013465.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' practices for recording passengers in flight logbooks for 'Epstein's planes'. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers, they would often use initials instead of full names to save space, citing 'SK' as an example of such an entry.
DOJ-OGR-00019103.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot. The questioning establishes the significant role of an unnamed woman in Epstein's organization during the 1990s, describing her as 'Epstein's number 2' who managed large properties, staff, and pilots, and had the authority to approve expenses and vacation time.
DOJ-OGR-00013467.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the flight logbook and also held by Larry Visoski, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies sending these same manifests to Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00013452.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot for Epstein. Rodgers testifies to never observing any evidence of sexual activity on the flights, such as discarded clothes, sex toys, or condoms, and states they have no reason to believe Epstein engaged in sexual activity with underage girls or women on the flights they piloted. The questioning then begins to explore the flight scheduling process, mentioning that Rodgers and a Larry Visoski would be alerted before a flight.
DOJ-OGR-00019038.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the communication methods used in the 1990s to schedule flights for someone named Epstein. It establishes that Rodgers and a colleague, Larry Visoski, would be contacted via beeper by Epstein's office and would then call back to speak with a secretary or assistant to arrange the flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013480.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' past interviews with the FBI in 2006 and with prosecutors in 2020 regarding flights he piloted for Epstein. The interrogator specifically asks about an entry in Rodgers' flight log for a person named 'Jane' and whether she was discussed in the initial FBI interview.
Entities connected to both Rodgers and Epstein
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship