Relationship Details

This August 14, 2006, article from the Palm Beach Post details the conflict surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the criticism Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter leveled against State Attorney Barry Krischer for his lenient handling of the case, and the subsequent personal attacks on Reiter's character by Epstein's high-powered legal team. The article contrasts the police's push for serious charges with the eventual plea deal, which dropped a federal investigation and allowed Epstein to avoid significant prison time.

A March 2007 FBI clipping from the West Palm Beach Post discusses the unusual lack of progress in the Jeffrey Epstein solicitation case. Legal experts and police speculate that the delays suggest a pending plea deal or an ongoing federal probe, with the FBI confirming they still have a 'pending case.' The article highlights the conflict between Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.

This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 14, 2006, detailing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights Reiter's push for harsher charges (sexual activity with minors) versus the State Attorney's lighter plea deal, and documents the personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Chief Reiter.

This document is an exhibit filed in court on May 25, 2017, containing a newspaper article detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It highlights how Alan Dershowitz provided prosecutors with social media evidence (MySpace) to discredit accusers, leading to delays in grand jury proceedings. The text also documents Police Chief Reiter's frustration, his request for arrest warrants on May 1, and his suggestion that Krischer disqualify himself from the case.

This document is a profile of Palm Beach Police Chief Mike Reiter, focusing on his actions related to the Epstein case. It details Reiter's sharp criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case, including a letter urging Krischer's recusal, and Reiter's subsequent referral of the case to the FBI. The text also provides background on Reiter's career, education, and includes quotes from colleagues praising his professionalism.

This document is an FBI filing (FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated July 26, 2006. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein for felony solicitation of prostitution following a long investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, which involved trash sifting and surveillance. It notably highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the handling of the charges, as police believed there was probable cause for more serious charges involving minors.

A newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post reporting on the aftermath of a grand jury decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Jack Goldberger accuses the Palm Beach Police Department and Chief Michael Reiter of distorting the case in the media to embarrass Epstein after the grand jury found insufficient evidence. The article highlights tension between Chief Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, referencing a May 1st letter where Reiter asked Krischer to disqualify himself.

This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 2006 discussing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details Reiter's push for more serious charges against Epstein, the subsequent plea deal controversy, and personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Reiter, including references to his divorce. The text criticizes the justice system's preferential treatment of wealthy defendants like Epstein.

An FBI clipping of a Palm Beach Post article from July 29, 2006, detailing how Alan Dershowitz, representing Jeffrey Epstein, provided the State Attorney's office with damaging information from MySpace to discredit teenage accusers. The article highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter, who wanted more serious charges, and the State Attorney's office, which secured a lesser indictment for solicitation. It also mentions intimidation tactics including private investigators following a victim's father and bribery attempts to stop witnesses from cooperating.

This document is an FBI clipping preservation form containing a July 26, 2006 article from The Palm Beach Post. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on solicitation charges following a long investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, which included surveillance of his home and private jet. The text highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, noting that police believed there was probable cause for more serious charges involving minors.

This document details the conflict between police (represented by Recarey and Chief Reiter) and the prosecutor (Krischer) regarding the handling of the initial 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how police sought serious charges, but the prosecutor referred the case to a grand jury that only heard from two witnesses, resulting in a minor indictment. Chief Reiter subsequently publicly opposed Krischer, referred the case to the FBI in July 2006, and faced social backlash in Palm Beach.