Relationship Details

This document is an Emergency Motion filed on June 14, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to quash a subpoena and prevent the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, scheduled for the following day. Epstein's lawyers argue that the subpoena issued by C.L.'s counsel (Spencer Kuvin) is premature under Rule 26(d) and that the cross-notice by Jane Doe's counsel (Brad Edwards) is invalid because discovery in the Jane Doe case had already concluded on May 31, 2010. The document includes the motion, a subpoena exhibit, and a cross-notice exhibit.

This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and an associated Subpoena filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Plaintiff Jane Doe, represented by attorney Brad Edwards of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, commanded Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, in New York City. The document contains the legal notice, the subpoena addressed to Bruhel at a New York address, and standard Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding subpoenas.

This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and a Subpoena issued by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. It commands Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, at Esquire Court Reporters in New York City. The subpoena was issued by Brad Edwards, attorney for the plaintiff.

This page from a legal filing details the judicial orders prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein from contacting his victims following his 2008 guilty plea. It outlines specific no-contact orders issued by Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo and the federal court. Furthermore, it documents two civil lawsuits filed by attorney Brad Edwards against Epstein in August and September 2008 on behalf of victims 'Jane Doe' and 'E.W.,' alleging sexual assault and a RICO conspiracy.

This document is a legal affidavit signed by attorney Brad Edwards on April 23, 2010, in support of obtaining a specific tape recording as evidence for a civil trial involving Jane Doe and Jeffrey Epstein. Edwards describes negotiations with Anne B. Carroll (representing the Daily News) and argues the tape is critical to prove Epstein's perjury and lack of remorse, noting that Epstein otherwise only pleads the Fifth Amendment. The document also mentions a 'Mr. Rush' who allegedly risked his job by disclosing the tape.

This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.

This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.