Relationship Details

This document is a legal response filed on August 22, 2008, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Epstein's lawyers state they have no opposition to the plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (DE 12). However, they dispute the plaintiff's certification of compliance, arguing that plaintiff's counsel filed the motion prematurely without properly conferring with the defense or waiting for a return call regarding Epstein's position.

This document is a court order from March 30, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sara Kellen (Case No. 09-80469-CIV-MARRA) in the Southern District of Florida. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer and file a joint scheduling and discovery report pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order outlines specific deadlines for pretrial discovery planning and scheduling conferences.

This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on May 4, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein opposes the court's potential order to consolidate multiple civil lawsuits (filed by various 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs) for all discovery purposes, arguing that while consolidating depositions is acceptable, full consolidation would confuse distinct facts and defenses unique to each case. The filing lists numerous related case numbers and requests clarification on how consolidation would operate regarding motion practice.

This document is Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to a civil complaint filed by Jane Doe II in the Southern District of Florida in October 2009. Epstein pleads the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination in response to most factual allegations. He asserts multiple affirmative defenses, claiming the plaintiff consented to the acts, that he believed she was 18 years or older, and that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations and various constitutional challenges to the retroactivity and application of 18 U.S.C. §2255.

This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed on June 30, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in the Southern District of Florida. The parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled, with each party bearing their own legal costs. The document notes that a settlement was reached, and the court retains jurisdiction to enforce its terms.

This document is a court order dated July 1, 2010, from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Peter R. Palermo grants the plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling of a settlement conference set for July 6, 2010, to ensure Jane Doe does not come into contact with Epstein, citing existing no-contact orders. The order stipulates specific arrival times for Epstein (8:30 AM), dismissal procedures, and explicitly forbids communication or harassment between the parties.

This document is a protective response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe on May 27, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida case against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests the court to promptly order the production of tax returns and other documents that Epstein has withheld on Fifth Amendment grounds, emphasizing that the trial date is set for July 19, 2010. The filing notes that negotiations with Epstein's counsel failed and lists numerous related cases and attorneys involved.

A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to attorney Roberta Kaplan providing documents in response to a request regarding the case Doe v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The enclosed documents include reports of grand jury subpoenas served on Jane Doe, a biographical report on Jane Doe, FBI contact reports, and evidence retrieved from Epstein's residences in New York (2019) and Palm Beach (trash pull in 2005).

This document is a Clerk's Notice of Reassignment from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated April 10, 2009. It notifies parties in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case ID: 502008CA020614XXXXMB) that the case has been reassigned from Judge Diana Lewis to Judge Donald W. Hafele. The document lists attorneys Robert Critton Jr, Michael Pike, Isidro Garcia, and Jack Goldberger on the distribution list.

This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 2010 (entered on docket June 30, 2010). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case brought by Plaintiff Jane Doe II against Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen following a settlement stipulation by the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.

A Proposed Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The document grants the Plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend the deadline for responding to Epstein's Motion to Dismiss until 15 days after a pending motion to remand is decided. The document was entered on the docket on September 18, 2008.

This document is page 6 of a legal complaint filed on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It concludes a count on civil conspiracy and introduces 'COUNT III: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress against Defendant Epstein,' alleging his conduct was outrageous and caused severe trauma to Jane Doe and her mother. The plaintiff demands judgment for compensatory and punitive damages, costs, and attorney's fees against all three defendants.

This document is the final page of a legal complaint filed in March 2008 by plaintiff "Jane Doe" against defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein paying Jane Doe $300 and Robson $200 for bringing Jane Doe to him. The complaint, filed by attorney Theodore J. Leopold, demands a jury trial and seeks compensatory, treble, and punitive damages under Florida law.

This document is a legal motion filed on June 28, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the civil case 'Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein' (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Epstein is requesting a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or a second mediation attempt before July 1, 2010, citing upcoming trial deadlines on July 19, 2010. The document notes that a previous mediation on April 5, 2010, with mediator Rodney Romano failed to produce an agreement.

This document is page 5 of a legal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 26, 2017. It outlines two counts: Count II, 'Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress,' brought by plaintiff Jane Doe and her parents (Father and Stepmother), and Count III, 'Loss of Parental Consortium,' brought by Jane Doe's Father. The plaintiffs allege Epstein's conduct was intentional and outrageous, causing severe emotional distress and damages for which they seek compensatory and punitive relief.