Relationship Details

This document is an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the FBI's Litigation Support Unit regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence, spanning from January 2019 to October 2020, focuses on discovery materials, specifically the processing of CDs and media files found in boxes from Florida. The document includes a specific report on technical difficulties accessing 48 audio files from 2006 Grand Jury testimony and lists other media including a 2007 FBI interview and a 2010 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein provided by attorney Brad Edwards.

An exhibit list from the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 25, 2009, for the case State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF4351). The document lists three exhibits submitted by the defense: two orders involving attorney Jack Goldberger and a copy of a 'Victims Petition for enforcement of Crime Victims Rights Act' associated with attorney Brad Edwards. The hearing type is noted as a 'Motion to Unseal records'.

A 2011 Daily Telegraph article (part of House Oversight records) details the sentencing of Epstein employee Rodriguez, who stole Epstein's 'black book' as an insurance policy against Epstein and Maxwell. The document quotes Rodriguez's lawyer stating Epstein's sentence might have been harsher had the book been found earlier, and mentions a defamation lawsuit Epstein filed against victim's lawyer Brad Edwards regarding a Ponzi scheme allegation.

This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.

This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.

Deposition transcript of Rothstein, who discusses his Ponzi scheme and the hiring of attorney Brad Edwards at his firm (RRA). Rothstein confirms his partner, Russell Adler, was a co-conspirator in the Ponzi scheme and recommended hiring Edwards because Edwards had a 'huge case involving a billionaire pedophile' (Epstein). Rothstein hoped the legitimate fees from the Epstein case would help him exit the Ponzi scheme during 2009.

This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.

This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.

This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.

This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the admissibility of a specific document compilation. The text details how former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell 97 pages of evidence to lawyer Brad Edwards in 2009, leading to an FBI sting operation where Rodriguez sold the documents to an undercover officer for $50,000. The filing argues these documents are unauthenticated hearsay, lack relevance to the current indictment, and should be excluded.