Acosta, as U.S. Attorney, approved a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein in 2008.
Acosta, as U.S. Attorney, approved a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein in 2008.
Acosta oversaw a plea deal for Mr. Epstein involving charges of solicitation
Acosta crafted a secret plea deal with Epstein.
Acosta gave Epstein a 'sweetheart plea deal'.
Acosta approved the NPA for Epstein.
Acosta led the office prosecuting Epstein; report criticizes the resulting NPA.
Acosta approved the NPA impacting Epstein's prosecution.
Federal prosecutors under Acosta's authority acquiesced to Epstein's demands.
Acosta brokered the non-prosecution agreement/plea deal for Epstein in South Florida.
EFTA00018174.pdf
This document is an email dated July 11, 2019, forwarding a New York Times opinion column by Gail Collins titled 'Trump Doesn’t Know About Labor.' The article criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role in securing a lenient plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein while U.S. Attorney in South Florida. It also highlights past comments by President Trump regarding his friendship with Epstein and discusses the transfer of the Epstein case to federal prosecutors in New York. The email subject line notes that the sender highlighted a specific part of the text, likely referring to the section about New York prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022463.jpg
This newspaper article from December 8, 2018, reports that over two dozen U.S. lawmakers are demanding an investigation into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role as a former federal prosecutor in brokering a lenient 2008 plea deal for multimillionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The call for a probe, spurred by a Miami Herald investigation, highlights how the deal granted Epstein immunity, hid the proceedings from his underage victims, and allowed him to serve only 13 months in jail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018020.jpg
This document is a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times dated March 4, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys to defend the 2007 plea deal overseen by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta. The letter argues that the plea deal was necessary due to a lack of evidence for federal crimes (such as sex trafficking or coercion) and claims the agreement achieved significant objectives including restitution and sex offender registration. The document includes court filing stamps indicating it was later used as an exhibit in a 2019 civil case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.jpg
This document is an email from Darren Indyke to 'jeevacation' (likely Epstein) and attorney Martin Weinberg, dated May 10, 2019. The body of the email is redacted for privilege, but it forwards a Miami Herald article from February 2019 regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending former prosecutor Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein plea deal. The document highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017768.jpg
This document is a printout of an Axios article dated April 15, 2019, filed as a court exhibit. It details an interview with Alan Dershowitz in which he admits he is still technically Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer and receives calls from him regarding legal issues, though he denies social contact. The article also references the 'sweetheart plea deal' brokered by Alexander Acosta and the recent Miami Herald investigation into the suppression of the FBI probe.
DOJ-OGR-00021333.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report analyzing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein. It details the public scrutiny following the 2018 Miami Herald report and OPR's investigation into whether the 'sweetheart deal' was motivated by improper influence. The text confirms that Alexander Acosta reviewed, revised, and approved the NPA, accepting full responsibility for it during his OPR interview.
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
This document is page 187 of an OPR report (filed in 2021/2023 court cases) analyzing former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The report concludes that Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' by pursuing a state-based resolution and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) without adequate consideration or team consultation, allowing Epstein to manipulate the process. It highlights that the decision left victims, the public, and federal agents (FBI and line AUSAs) dissatisfied with the justice achieved.
DOJ-OGR-00021374.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report analyzing U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It criticizes the reliance on state procedures for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), noting that the specific state charges selected allowed Epstein to avoid sex offender registration in New Mexico due to age-of-consent laws. It also details that Acosta was aware the Palm Beach Police Department distrusted the State Attorney's Office, yet he proceeded with a plea deal that relied heavily on state authorities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017966.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It features an interview with Courtney Wild (Jane Doe No. 1), a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who discusses being misled by prosecutors regarding Epstein's plea deal and her subsequent lawsuit against the federal government for violating the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text also references Alexander Acosta's role as the prosecutor who oversaw the lenient non-prosecution agreement.
Entities connected to both Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship