Relationship Details

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about their knowledge of Ghislaine's residences, confirming she had a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and another residence at 44 Kinnerton Street in London. The witness also states that, to their knowledge, Ghislaine never lived with Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The questioning focuses on identifying the locations and types of residences belonging to a person named Ghislaine on the Upper East Side, specifically on 84th Street and 64th/65th Street. During the testimony, the witness momentarily confuses the questioning with Jeffrey Epstein's residence on 71st Street, indicating a perceived connection between Ghislaine and Epstein.

This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Mr. Rodgers confirms that his former employer, Jeffrey Epstein, paid for his daughter's private high school and college tuition and that this was a benefit provided to all employees. When asked if he told Ghislaine about this arrangement, Rodgers states he doesn't recall but assumes she knew.

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing part of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. She argues that her client, Ghislaine, is being unfairly targeted as a 'scapegoat' and 'convenient stand-in' for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein to satisfy victims seeking justice. The transcript shows another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, making objections that are overruled by the court.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning challenges the witness's testimony by highlighting inconsistencies between her current account and a prior statement she gave to the government on September 19, 2019, concerning an encounter with Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein and a discussion about scholarships. The witness suggests that any discrepancies may be due to transcription errors by the FBI.

This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by suggesting her memory of abuse in New Mexico was implanted by the government's repeated questioning. The attorney emphasizes that Jane does not recall Ghislaine being present with Jeffrey Epstein during any of the alleged abuse, which is a central point for the case.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa confirms knowledge of two of Ghislaine's residences: a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and a property at 44 Kinnerton Street in London, which Espinosa states they visited three years prior. The witness also testifies that to their knowledge, Ghislaine never resided with Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is an email or communication, identified as the property of Jeffrey Epstein. The unidentified author speculates about a 'current fuss over Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell), predicting her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton and the power of money will allow her to weather the scandal. The author compares the situation to other wealthy individuals like Sam Waksal and Martha Stewart, suggesting the very rich often have strange habits or break the law.