Mr. Leopold mentions objecting on "attorney/client privilege" and refers to his "client".
Mr. Leopold mentions 'my client' and making objections based on 'attorney/client privilege'.
Mr. Leopold states 'I will protect my client' and mentions allowing 'the client to answer the question'.
Mr. Leopold states 'I will protect my client' and mentions allowing 'the client to answer the question'.
Mr. Leopold states 'I will protect my client' and mentions allowing 'the client to answer the question'.
Mr. Leopold states 'I will protect my client' and mentions allowing 'the client to answer the question'.
Mr. Leopold states 'I will protect my client' and mentions allowing 'the client to answer the question'.
Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold that 'The questions are to your client', indicating Mr. Leopold is representing the person being deposed.
Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold that 'The questions are to your client', indicating Mr. Leopold is representing the person being deposed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012419.jpg
This document is a two-page transcript from a contentious legal deposition, likely related to a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation. It captures a heated argument between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedure and professional conduct, with a third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, attempting to mediate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404.jpg
This document is page 9 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404'. It captures a procedural argument between attorneys, where Mr. Tein repeatedly instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections.' Mr. Leopold defends his actions as necessary to protect his client from improperly formulated questions, while another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, suggests a simpler method of objection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012409.jpg
This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship