Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Relationship Details

MR. LEOPOLD → Adversarial counsel → MR. TEIN
Back to Relationships

Connected Entities

Entity A
MR. LEOPOLD
Type: person
Mentions: 318
Also known as: MR. LEOPOLD and MR. GOLDBERGER
Entity B
MR. TEIN
Type: person
Mentions: 444
Also known as: MR. TEIN's party

Evidence

Mr. Tein repeatedly demands that Mr. Leopold stop his 'speaking objections,' while Mr. Leopold refuses, indicating they are opposing lawyers in a legal proceeding.

Mr. Tein repeatedly demands that Mr. Leopold stop his 'speaking objections,' while Mr. Leopold refuses, indicating they are opposing lawyers in a legal proceeding.

Mr. Tein repeatedly demands that Mr. Leopold stop his 'speaking objections,' while Mr. Leopold refuses, indicating they are opposing lawyers in a legal proceeding.

Mr. Tein repeatedly demands that Mr. Leopold stop his 'speaking objections,' while Mr. Leopold refuses, indicating they are opposing lawyers in a legal proceeding.

Mr. Tein repeatedly demands that Mr. Leopold stop his 'speaking objections,' while Mr. Leopold refuses, indicating they are opposing lawyers in a legal proceeding.

The transcript shows them in a contentious argument during a deposition, with Mr. Tein accusing Mr. Leopold of obstruction.

The transcript shows them in a contentious argument during a deposition, with Mr. Tein accusing Mr. Leopold of obstruction.

Source Documents (2)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404.jpg

Deposition Transcript • 933 KB
View

This document is page 9 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404'. It captures a procedural argument between attorneys, where Mr. Tein repeatedly instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections.' Mr. Leopold defends his actions as necessary to protect his client from improperly formulated questions, while another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, suggests a simpler method of objection.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012409.jpg

Deposition Transcript • 852 KB
View

This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both MR. LEOPOLD and MR. TEIN

Unnamed Co-counsel (person)
Saige (person)
Unnamed Interviewee (A) (person)
Unnamed female witness (person)
Witness (A) (person)
Unnamed Deponent (person)
Unnamed Witness (person)
THE WITNESS (person)

MR. LEOPOLD's Other Relationships

Business associate MR. GOLDBERGER
Strength: 10/10 View
Adversarial opposing counsel MR. TEIN
Strength: 10/10 View
Client Saige
Strength: 10/10 View
Client Unnamed Client/Witness
Strength: 10/10 View
Opposing counsel MR. TEIN
Strength: 10/10 View

MR. TEIN's Other Relationships

Opposing counsel MR. LEOPOLD
Strength: 10/10 View
Legal representative MR. LEOPOLD
Strength: 10/10 View
Questioner deponent THE WITNESS
Strength: 10/10 View
Adversarial opposing counsel MR. LEOPOLD
Strength: 10/10 View
Legal representative THE WITNESS
Strength: 10/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Adversarial counsel
Relationship Strength
10/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-17 06:10
Last Updated
2025-11-17 06:25

Entity Network Stats

MR. LEOPOLD 48 relationships
MR. TEIN 70 relationships
Mutual connections 8

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship