Relationship Details

This document is page 34 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a massage she gave to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that, contrary to just giving a massage, Epstein also asked her to remove her bra and did touch her. She denies touching Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off,' which she clarifies means masturbating, and is confronted with what appears to be a contradictory prior statement to the police.

This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.

This document is page 19 of a deposition transcript featuring a heated argument between opposing counsel, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedures in West Palm Beach. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction before proceeding to question the deponent, Saige, about whether she believes giving testimony is 'bull s-h-i-t' and if she wrote that on MySpace the previous week.

This document is page 23 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012418'. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Leopold vehemently objects to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct and harassment.

This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.

This document is page 16 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a female witness about a message she sent on MySpace. The questioning becomes contentious when Mr. Tein asks if the witness finds a racial slur offensive, implying she used it, which the witness denies. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, leading to procedural arguments between the lawyers.

This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript, potentially from a U.S. House Oversight investigation. An unnamed witness is questioned about using the racial slur 'Niggaa' in a message, which they state they do not find offensive. The transcript also captures a heated procedural argument between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, over the questioning and the proper identification of an exhibit numbered 31-001.

This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.

This document is page 11 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein by attorney Jeffrey Herman. The deponent's counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects but the deponent ultimately confirms their awareness of the lawsuit.

This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript showing a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Mr. Leopold is objecting to the line of questioning, arguing for professionalism and accusing Mr. Tein of harassing the witness. Mr. Tein urges Mr. Leopold to conclude his objection so that he can continue asking questions.

This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition dated September 29, 2010. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over a question Mr. Tein posed to an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of asking an improper and unethical question intended to make the witness, who claimed not to remember something, appear to be lying.