The document is a transcript of a formal question-and-answer session (direct examination) between a witness and an attorney in a legal proceeding.
The document is a transcript of a formal question-and-answer session (direct examination) between a questioner and a witness (Brune) in a legal setting.
The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning (redirect examination) of the witness (Brune) by an examiner.
The document is a transcript of a formal direct examination in a legal proceeding.
The questioner is conducting a direct examination of the witness, Ms. Brune, in a formal legal setting.
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00010009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. Brune, who appears to be associated with the defense counsel, is questioned about their understanding of the voir dire process, confirming that while the judge leads the questioning of potential jurors, the defense could propose questions and request inquiries into new areas, but the final decision to ask any question rested with the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Brune. She is questioned about whether a legal brief she submitted contained material omissions. Ms. Brune denies any intent to omit material facts, stating they tried to be accurate and were shocked by information received in a subsequent letter.
DOJ-OGR-00009988.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on Brune's legal background, including experience with trials as both a government and private counsel, and conducting Grand Jury investigations. Brune also confirms their personal investment in and pride for their law firm.
DOJ-OGR-00010003.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on her and her team's failure to conduct prior research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, whose name was identical to one found in a New York court opinion. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team of nearly two dozen people to perform this additional research before the voir dire process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship