Relationship Details

Brune Professional Unnamed Questioner

Connected Entities

Entity A
Brune
Type: person
Mentions: 216
Also known as: Brune firm (hypothetical), Edelstein and Ms. Brune
Entity B
Unnamed Questioner
Type: person
Mentions: 53
Also known as: Unnamed Questioner (Attorney)

Evidence

The document is a transcript of a formal question-and-answer session (direct examination) between a witness and an attorney in a legal proceeding.

The document is a transcript of a formal question-and-answer session (direct examination) between a questioner and a witness (Brune) in a legal setting.

The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning (redirect examination) of the witness (Brune) by an examiner.

The document is a transcript of a formal direct examination in a legal proceeding.

The questioner is conducting a direct examination of the witness, Ms. Brune, in a formal legal setting.

Source Documents (5)

DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg

Unknown type • 401 KB
View

This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.

DOJ-OGR-00010009.jpg

Unknown type • 424 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. Brune, who appears to be associated with the defense counsel, is questioned about their understanding of the voir dire process, confirming that while the judge leads the questioning of potential jurors, the defense could propose questions and request inquiries into new areas, but the final decision to ask any question rested with the Court.

DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg

Unknown type • 445 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Brune. She is questioned about whether a legal brief she submitted contained material omissions. Ms. Brune denies any intent to omit material facts, stating they tried to be accurate and were shocked by information received in a subsequent letter.

DOJ-OGR-00009988.jpg

Unknown type • 429 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on Brune's legal background, including experience with trials as both a government and private counsel, and conducting Grand Jury investigations. Brune also confirms their personal investment in and pride for their law firm.

DOJ-OGR-00010003.jpg

legal document • 430 KB
View

This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on her and her team's failure to conduct prior research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, whose name was identical to one found in a New York court opinion. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team of nearly two dozen people to perform this additional research before the voir dire process.

Brune's Other Relationships

Professional Ms. Edelstein
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Theresa Trzaskoma
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Ms. Trzaskoma
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Judge Pauley
Strength: 9/10 View
Business associate Ms. Trzaskoma
Strength: 9/10 View

Unnamed Questioner's Other Relationships

Professional Dr. Rocchio
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Rocchio
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Loftus
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Flatley
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional Maguire
Strength: 8/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
9/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
5
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:45
Last Updated
2025-11-20 18:01

Entity Network Stats

Brune 72 relationships
Unnamed Questioner 53 relationships
Mutual connections 0

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship