Relationship Details

This document is an email chain from April 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely US Marshals regarding the logistics of transporting Ghislaine Maxwell to the courthouse at 500 Pearl Street. The purpose of the transport was to allow Maxwell and her defense team to review physical evidence held by the FBI over a period of four days (April 13-16, 2021). The emails confirm the schedule, arrival times (9:15 AM), and parking arrangements for the attorneys involved.

This is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 18) dated July 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be released on bail because the government failed to prove she is a flight risk and because the COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant health risk to her in detention, citing the precedent of United States v. Stephens. The document also highlights that detention would hinder her ability to prepare a defense due to restrictions on attorney access.

This document is an email chain from January 7-8, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely BOP/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA requested permission for Maxwell's defense counsel to hand-deliver a hard drive containing discovery materials to the MDC because Maxwell could not view the previous CD and the AUSA's office could not deliver it before the weekend. The request was denied, with the respondent stating the materials must come directly from the US Attorney's office.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for early disclosure of witness names and court intervention in her confinement conditions. The Government argues the requests are premature given the trial is 11 months away and discovery has just begun, noting they have already produced over 165,000 pages of evidence. The letter also defends the Bureau of Prisons' protocols for Maxwell, stating her monitoring is appropriate for a high-profile inmate facing significant prison time and confirming she has been granted extensive daily access to review discovery materials.

An email chain from April 2021 involving FBI agents discussing logistical support for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. The correspondence details the need for agents to monitor Maxwell, manage her custody transfers from US Marshals, and secure proffer rooms for her defense team to review evidence.

An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated January 7, 2021, requesting permission regarding the delivery of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell. Due to technical issues with a previous CD, a new drive was prepared. To allow Maxwell to review the materials over the weekend, the AUSA asks if defense counsel is permitted to pick up the drive from the SDNY office and hand-deliver it to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) themselves.

An email chain from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and redacted recipients regarding discovery materials for Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution explains that Maxwell could not view materials provided on CD, so a new drive was prepared. Due to logistical constraints, the AUSA asks for permission to allow defense counsel to hand-deliver the drive to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) so Maxwell can review it over the weekend.

This document contains a series of internal FBI email threads from October and November 2020 coordinating logistical support for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Agents from the New York Field Office (Squad C-20, Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking) are canvassing for volunteers to escort digital evidence (a laptop and hard drive) to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) so Maxwell and her defense team can review discovery materials. Special Agents Ambrosini and Chang are identified as volunteers to assist with these reviews.

This is page 50 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. The defense counsel is arguing for bail by citing legal precedents (Bodmer and Khashoggi) where foreign citizens with extradition concerns or significant wealth were granted bail. The lawyer argues that denying bail simply because France does not extradite citizens would effectively bar all French citizens from bail in the US.

This document is page 3 of a government filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 21, 2020. The government argues against modifying a protective order, asserting that the defendant should not be allowed to use discovery materials from this criminal case in her parallel civil cases. The filing highlights that the grand jury investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators is active and ongoing, and that disseminating these materials could compromise witness privacy and the investigation.