Relationship Details

This document contains email metadata from November 16, 2020. The email is addressed to Bobbi C Sternheim, Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, regarding 'Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509' (her BOP register number). The sender and other recipients are redacted, but the Bcc field includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111', suggesting an automated archiving or monitoring system.

This document is a printout of email metadata sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on November 1, 2020. The subject concerns Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically referencing her BOP Register Number (02879-509). The email includes an embedded message file. Recipients and other participant details are redacted.

This document contains email metadata from January 7, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (referencing her inmate number 02879-509). The email was routed through the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) system and addressed to her defense team, including Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, and Mark Cohen.

This document is an email dated August 18, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to other defense counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to transmit a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell. The attachment references 'Letter_re_VTCs', likely concerning Video Teleconferences for the trial proceedings.

This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP submits reply memoranda and exhibits for pretrial motions to Judge Nathan's chambers and government prosecutors (USANYS), noting that documents are being filed under seal with redacted versions for the public docket.

This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from August 25, 2020, to October 6, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests regarding victim identities, prison conditions, and modifications to a protective order. The docket also records Maxwell's subsequent appeal, the sealing of various documents, and the appearance of new defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a court docket summary from February 2022 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details several procedural orders regarding motions for a new trial, redactions to protect juror privacy, and the filing of an amicus brief. The most significant entry is an order granting an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, while denying a broader hearing involving other jurors.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between May 10, 2022, and June 21, 2022. It details pre-sentencing motions, including a denied request for an extension by the defense and granted motions regarding Speedy Trial Exclusion. Significant entries include logistical orders for the June 28, 2022 sentencing hearing and strict protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims Rights Act.