Relationship Details

An email chain from October 18, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (including Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The correspondence finalizes the date for Jeffrey Epstein to enter his guilty plea on November 20, 2007. The USAFLS specifically requests confirmation that postponing the plea date will not delay the start of Epstein's sentence.

This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.

This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.

This document is an email chain from October 18, 2007, involving US Attorney Alex Acosta, attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis), and USAFLS staff. The emails discuss scheduling Jeffrey Epstein's 'change of plea' hearing, ultimately agreeing on November 20, 2007. The correspondence reveals a personal rapport between Acosta and Lefkowitz, noting a recent breakfast meeting, and discusses ensuring the date change does not impact when Epstein begins serving his sentence.

A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated October 9, 2007. Acosta rejects a proposal regarding the resolution of victim claims under the Non-Prosecution Agreement and instead proposes using Judge Davis to select attorneys for the victims and potentially serve as a mediator for out-of-court settlements paid for by Epstein. Acosta also mentions attempting to coordinate with other defense team members Jay Lefkowitz and Guy Lewis.

This document is an email thread from October 30-31, 2007, between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence discusses the execution of an addendum, the role of Judge Davis, and the handling of discovery/subpoenas to verify claims. The government official clarifies that Epstein has waived his right to contest liability and damages under the agreement and that their office's role is strictly limited to monitoring potential breaches of the NPA.

This document is page 2 of a legal affidavit, likely filed by representatives of the New York Post in December 2018. It details the newspaper's efforts to unseal legal briefs related to an appeal by Jeffrey Epstein, chronicling communications between Post reporter Susan Edelman and the Manhattan DA's office, as well as the affiant's communications with Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Martin Weinberg. The DA's office indicated they would not oppose a petition for a redacted brief.

This document is page 3 of a letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team to Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008. The text argues that the case against Epstein is a local solicitation of prostitution matter that should be handled by the State Attorney in Palm Beach, rather than federal prosecutors (USAO). The defense claims federal involvement is politically motivated by Epstein's connection to Bill Clinton and accuses federal prosecutors of leaking information to the New York Times and interfering with state plea negotiations.

This document is an email chain from March 2011 in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz forwards a media inquiry from Newsweek reporter Alexandra Wolfe to Michael Sitrick and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). Wolfe submits a list of questions for Epstein regarding the status of his business (specifically if it is still valued at $15 billion), his work during his prison sentence, his focus on his Science Foundation, and whether he remains close with Ghislaine Maxwell. The document contains a privilege redaction block and originates from House Oversight Committee files.

This email thread from March 2011 documents a media inquiry from Newsweek journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel, Jay Lefkowitz. Wolfe submits a list of probing questions regarding Epstein's business valuation ($15 billion), his work arrangements while in prison, his Science Foundation, his reaction to his sentence, and his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell. Lefkowitz forwards these questions to Epstein and PR consultant Michael Sitrick.

This email chain from March 2011 features Jay Lefkowitz forwarding a press inquiry from Alexandra Wolfe (Newsweek) to Jeffrey Epstein and PR consultant Michael Sitrick. Wolfe submits a list of probing questions regarding Epstein's post-conviction life, business value ($15 billion), relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, and charity work with Bill Clinton. Lefkowitz responds defensively to Wolfe, warning against libel and stating implies Epstein is traveling.

This document is an email thread from March 7, 2011, between Jeffrey Epstein, Jay Lefkowitz, and journalist Alexandra Wolfe. Wolfe submits a list of probing questions to Lefkowitz intended for Epstein, inquiring about his science foundation, business valuation ($15 billion), work during prison, relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, and charity work with Bill Clinton. Epstein forwards the thread to Lefkowitz with a redacted privileged response.

This document is an email chain ending on March 8, 2011, in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a list of interview questions from journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Mike Sitrick. The questions, originally sent to attorney Jay Lefkowitz, probe Epstein's post-prison life, the status of his $15 billion business, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, and his charitable work with Bill Clinton.