The document discusses 'communications between Jane and Brian' and immediately follows with a statement that no sequestration order 'prevents family members from talking to one another'.
Ms. Menninger refers to "conversations she [Jane] had with her brother," implying Brian is Jane's brother.
DOJ-OGR-00013017.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the rules of witness sequestration, specifically concerning communications between two witnesses, Jane and Brian, who are implied to be family members. The judge questions the legality and propriety of sequestered witnesses being provided with trial transcripts, testing the boundaries of the sequestration order.
DOJ-OGR-00013280.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a dialogue between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and defense counsel (Ms. Menninger). The discussion focuses on the defense's intentions regarding witnesses Jane and Brian, specifically whether Brian will be released from his subpoena and if Jane will be recalled. Ms. Menninger states Brian is already under subpoena, prompting the judge to recall her previous statement that she would not subpoena him.
Entities connected to both JANE and Brian
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship