Relationship Details

This document is page 48 of a court filing (Document 621) from February 25, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that the Court should deny Maxwell's Rule 29 motion for acquittal, specifically addressing Count One (conspiracy). The text references testimony from a victim named 'Jane' who stated she was abused by both Epstein and Maxwell in New York and was groomed through methods including 'field trips.'

This document is a page from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text outlines how Maxwell and a 'middle-aged man' (implied Epstein) targeted victims like 'Jane' between 1994 and 2004. It details Maxwell's role in grooming victims through shopping trips and normalizing sexual topics to facilitate their abuse.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Charge to the jury) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing specific overt acts committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines incidents from 1996 through 2004 involving three specific victims (referred to as Jane, Annie, and Carolyn), including interstate travel for sexual abuse, unsolicited sexual contact in New Mexico, and the recruitment of minors for paid sex acts at the Palm Beach residence.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the beginning of the government's rebuttal argument delivered by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Comey refocuses the jury on Maxwell's specific alleged crimes, mentioning victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie by name, and argues that the defense is attempting to distract from the evidence presented by her colleague, Ms. Moe.

This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues for Maxwell's guilt by recounting the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and 'Annie Farmer'. The summary details how Jane's testimony of sexual exploitation by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein was corroborated, and describes Epstein's initial grooming of a 16-year-old Annie Farmer in 1995, presenting these as part of a consistent 'playbook' of abuse.

This page from a legal filing (likely a government appellate brief) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable. It details that Maxwell transported a victim named 'Jane' to New York for sexual abuse and that abuse also occurred at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. The document confirms Maxwell's sentence of 240 months imprisonment, which was slightly above the calculated guideline range of 188-235 months.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, concerning the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker (likely the judge) describes Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory,' detailing how she recruited and groomed vulnerable minors for Jeffrey Epstein. Specific testimony from a victim named 'Jane' is cited, describing how Maxwell befriended her at age 14, normalized sexual abuse, and instructed her on how to sexually touch Epstein.

This document is page 56 of a court transcript from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 22, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Moe is addressing the court, requesting an above-guideline sentence of multiple decades in prison for Maxwell's role in a child exploitation scheme. The prosecutor specifically names victims Jane, Kate, Annie, Virginia, Carolyn, and Melissa, detailing that Maxwell first met Jane at a summer camp in 1994 when Jane was 14.

This document is a page from the summation (closing arguments) delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell enticed a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' to travel to New York via plane, using money, gifts, and school payments provided by Epstein as inducement. The text outlines the legal elements of the crime, asserting that Maxwell intended for Jane to engage in criminal sexual activity with Epstein, who was provided access to the underage girl for molestation rather than mentorship.

This document is page 26 of a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that the testimony of a victim named 'Jane' is corroborated by the physical description of a massage room and the testimony of Juan Alessi. Alessi confirmed Jane's young age (14-15), her presence at the house, and that he transported her to and from school and to the airport with Maxwell and Epstein.

This page from a 2023 appellate filing (likely by the government) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's convictions on Counts Three and Four properly qualify as offenses involving sexual abuse of a child, citing testimony from a victim named 'Jane.' It also begins a section defending the District Court's decision regarding 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose his own history of childhood sexual abuse during jury selection.

This document is a page from the prosecution's summation (Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text outlines the 'playbook' used by Maxwell and Epstein to groom victims named Annie, Jane, and Kate, which included isolating them, offering financial promises (tuition, trips), and normalizing sexual contact. Specific incidents detailed include Epstein lying to Annie's mother about Ghislaine being his wife, and Maxwell initiating sexual contact during massages.