Relationship Details

This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated January 15, 2021, communicating a court order to an unidentified recipient (likely prison officials). The email contains the text of a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which orders the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her laptop on weekends and holidays for reviewing discovery materials.

This document is a court docket sheet from late July 2020 detailing filings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records a dispute regarding a protective order, where the defense sought to allow Maxwell to publicly name victims who had already spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from disseminating the identities of alleged victims or witnesses to protect their privacy.

This document is the cover page of the official court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 3, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the legal teams for both the prosecution (led by Damian Williams) and the defense (including Haddon Morgan and Foreman attorneys), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is the signature page (page 15 of 15) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 18, 2020, and filed on December 23, 2020. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their contact information.

This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.

This document is page 3 of a U.S. District Court criminal docket sheet for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell), filed on June 29, 2020, and assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details the defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell (also listed as Sealed Defendant 1), specifically listing five attorneys from three different law firms (Cohen & Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim) along with their contact information. The document carries a Bates stamp of DOJ-OGR-00019718.

This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 2, 2022. It details the scheduling of a hearing for March 8, 2022, to question 'Juror 50' regarding potential misconduct or questionnaire discrepancies. Key entries reveal that Juror 50's attorney, Todd Spodek, informed the court that the juror intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination, leading the Government to seek approval to compel testimony via immunity.

This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).

This document is a docket summary from a legal case involving defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It details a series of court filings and orders from December 2020 concerning Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and the redaction of related documents. The court applies a three-part test from the Second Circuit case *Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga* to approve proposed redactions from both the defense and the government, ultimately culminating in a December 28, 2020 order denying Maxwell's motion for release on bail.

This document is a court docket sheet and memorandum opinion from July 2020 regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the legal dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims and witnesses. Judge Alison J. Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from referencing alleged victims, citing the need to protect their privacy and safety despite previous public statements.

This document is the final page of a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 29, 2020. The defense argues for a protective order to restrict prospective witnesses—specifically those who have also filed civil suits against Maxwell—from using criminal discovery materials to bolster their civil cases or leak information to the press. The document highlights the intertwined nature of the criminal indictment and existing civil complaints.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.

This document is a cover letter filed on July 2, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It accompanies the filing of unsealed Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress, in compliance with a court order dated July 1, 2021. The document bears the case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and a DOJ bates stamp.

This document is a court docket sheet (Page 7 of 24) from July 2020 regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural events including the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear (Pro Hac Vice), and a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the logistics for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The document also lists the appearances of attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell for the defense.

This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a page from the Criminal Docket for Case # 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1, USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant (also noted as Sealed Defendant 1) and details her legal defense team, including attorneys Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Mark Stewart Cohen, along with their contact information.

Defense attorney Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order compelling the BOP/MDC to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review 'millions of documents' for her defense. The letter argues there are no security impediments to this request. Judge Nathan grants the unobjected-to request and orders the BOP to provide said access on January 15, 2021.

This document is a page from a court docket report regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details filings from July 2020, specifically focusing on a dispute over a protective order wherein Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to protect the privacy and safety of victims and witnesses.

This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.

This document is a court docket page from the Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) criminal proceedings, specifically covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the legal arguments and subsequent court order regarding a 'Protective Order' governing confidential materials. Judge Alison Nathan ruled against Maxwell's request to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly, citing a need to protect witness privacy and the integrity of the criminal investigation.

This document is the signature page (page 11 of the document, marked as page 10 of 15 in the filing header) of a legal submission dated December 18, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, comprising attorneys from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This is a court docket log from the Ghislaine Maxwell case covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the dispute and subsequent ruling on a Protective Order where Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken to the media about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict the public identification of victims and witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.

This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It logs correspondence between the Prosecution (USA) and Defense regarding discovery deadlines, disclosure delays, and investigative files, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the USCA and the extension of discovery and motion deadlines into early 2021.

This document is a Certificate of Service from the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It attests that on January 25, 2021, Christian R. Everdell served a legal memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The served memorandum was a motion to suppress evidence and dismiss two counts against Maxwell.