Relationship Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, concerning the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. The text details a legal discussion between attorney Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the admissibility and formatting of message exhibits, followed by a recess. After the recess, Ms. Moe highlights Government Exhibit 606, a household manual, specifically quoting instructions on page 7 regarding how employees should record phone messages.

This document is page 76 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and Mr. Pagliuca (Defense) regarding the evidentiary weight and authenticity of message books/logs. Ms. Moe argues the logs are sequential and chronological, while Mr. Pagliuca contends they are disorganized, missing dates, and that multiple books were used haphazardly by staff.

This is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca explains difficulties in finalizing a witness list because the government rested its case earlier than expected, causing scheduling and travel issues. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the defense was warned repeatedly and demands immediate production of Rule 26 materials, including expert communications, contracts, and witness interview notes.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion where the Judge instructs Defense Attorney Mr. Pagliuca to provide witness lists and exhibits, noting that the Government (represented here by Ms. Moe) is expected to rest its case that week. The proceedings are briefly interrupted by an unexplained noise, which the Judge jokingly refers to as 'the ghost of Friday.'

This document is a page from a court transcript filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding 'Exhibit 52' (identified as a book). The defense argues against providing the full book to the jury due to limited cross-examination and relevance, while the prosecution argues the physical object is necessary for the jury to evaluate its authenticity.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the admissibility of spiral-bound message books kept by household staff, specifically Ms. Hesse, under the 'business records exception.' The defense argues that despite Ms. Hesse's records being well-maintained, other messages in the collection are undated and unsigned, challenging the consistency of the household practice.

This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically the direct examination of a witness named Dubin (likely Eva Dubin). Prosecutor Mr. Pagliuca asks the witness if they have seen media reports regarding Jeffrey Epstein's flight records and whether they believed them to be accurate. Defense attorney Ms. Moe objects twice asking for more specificity, and the Judge sustains the objection, asking Pagliuca to define the timeframe and quantity of the records being discussed.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Prosecutor Ms. Moe discusses the admissibility and formatting of message exhibits and specifically reads from Government Exhibit 606, a 'household manual,' detailing strict instructions for employees on how to record phone messages.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 10, 2021. It details a discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the defense (Mr. Pagliuca), and the Judge regarding the physical inspection of evidence that occurred on November 1st. The Judge instructs the government not to mention specific evidence with uncertain admissibility in their opening statement and transitions the proceedings to discuss the admissibility of co-conspirator statements.

This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed in August 2022 but recording events during the trial's jury deliberations (likely December 2021). The Judge discusses a note received from the jury requesting to end the day at 5:00 p.m. and resume the next morning. Citing the risk of the 'omicron variant,' the Judge rules that deliberations must continue every day, including weekends if necessary, until a verdict is reached.

This document is page 13 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a dispute between prosecutor Ms. Moe and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding Government Exhibit 52G; the defense successfully objects to the prosecution directing jurors specifically to entries labeled 'massage, Florida.' The court also admits Government Exhibit 1009 as a public stipulation.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of a 'spiral bound book' of message slips during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Pagliuca objects under Federal Rules of Evidence 801 and 803.6, arguing the witness lacks the knowledge to establish a business record foundation, while Moe counters that the authenticity of the book itself is not in dispute.

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a courtroom exchange where Prosecutor Ms. Moe asks jurors to review Government Exhibit 52G (sealed), specifically trying to point them to entries regarding 'massage, Florida.' Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to this direction, and the objection is sustained by the Court, allowing jurors to review the document without specific direction.