The document is a filing in the criminal case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', where the government is the prosecutor and Maxwell is the defendant.
The document is a filing in the criminal case "United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell," where the government is the prosecutor and Maxwell is the defendant.
The document is a filing in the criminal case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', where the Government is the prosecutor and Maxwell is the defendant.
The case is titled 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', indicating the Government is prosecuting Ms. Maxwell.
Opposing parties in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Case caption: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
DOJ-OGR-00002337.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government states it does not object to Maxwell's request for weekend laptop access to review discovery materials but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter emphasizes that Maxwell has already been provided with extensive access, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, for more hours than any other inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00001635.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 21, 2020, from Jeffrey Pagliuca of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney, representing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, requests that the court issue an order prohibiting the U.S. Government and its affiliates from making extrajudicial statements about the case, arguing such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is a response to the government's motion to prevent a witness, Alexander Hamilton, from testifying about four specific topics related to an individual named 'Kate'. The defense argues that providing Hamilton's declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 does not obligate them to introduce all of its contents as evidence.
EFTA00010243.pdf
This is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) issued on October 5, 2021, to The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. It demands the production of employment records regarding a redacted individual for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance/production date is set for November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005203.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated October 12, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In response to a court order, the government estimates its case-in-chief will last approximately four weeks. The letter also confirms that the government has provided the defense with its exhibit list, witness list, and other required materials.
DOJ-OGR-00010335.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 653) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 1, 2022. It outlines the legal standards for granting a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, specifically addressing juror nondisclosure during voir dire. The text cites the 'McDonough' standard, stating that a defendant must prove a juror failed to answer a material question honestly and that a correct answer would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.
Entities connected to both GHISLAINE MAXWELL and United States Government
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship