DOJ-OGR-00002105.jpg
874 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
7
Organizations
6
Locations
10
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
874 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Subject of extradition requests and allegations of offences; defendant in a legal case
|
|
| Ahmad |
Party in the legal case 'Ahmad v United Kingdom'
|
|
| Bermingham |
Party in the legal case 'R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office'
|
|
| Short |
Party in the legal case 'Short v Falkland Islands'
|
|
| Henderson |
Party in the legal case 'Henderson v Government of Australia'
|
|
| Kakis |
Party in the legal case 'Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus'
|
|
| Gomes |
Party in the legal case 'Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago'
|
|
| Norris |
Party in the legal case 'Norris v Government of United States of America'
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| US | government agency |
Requesting state in an extradition case; has longstanding extradition arrangements with the United Kingdom
|
| United Kingdom | country |
Has longstanding extradition arrangements with the US; party in the legal case 'Ahmad v United Kingdom'
|
| Director of the Serious Fraud Office | government agency |
Party in the legal case 'R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office'
|
| Government of Australia | government agency |
Party in the legal case 'Henderson v Government of Australia'
|
| Government of the Republic of Cyprus | government agency |
Party in the legal case 'Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus'
|
| Government of Trinidad and Tobago | government agency |
Party in the legal case 'Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago'
|
| Government of United States of America | government agency |
Party in the legal case 'Norris v Government of United States of America'
|
Timeline (10 events)
1994-1997
Alleged commission of offences by Ms. Maxwell, as per the superseding indictment.
Extradition requests are rarely discharged on the basis of political motivation or abuse of process.
Ms. Maxwell
US prosecutor
Extradition orders upheld in cases with similar timescales (20 and 33 years) involving historic allegations of sexual offending.
Locations (6)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The requesting state in an extradition case
|
|
|
Has extradition arrangements with the US; mentioned in a legal case
|
|
|
Mentioned in the legal case 'Short v Falkland Islands'
|
|
|
Mentioned in the legal case 'Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus'
|
|
|
Mentioned in the legal case 'Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago'
|
|
|
Referring to United States of America in a legal case 'Norris v Government of United States of America'
|
Relationships (2)
The US prosecutor is seeking Ms. Maxwell's extradition, and Ms. Maxwell is unlikely to establish bad faith on their part.
The United Kingdom has longstanding extradition arrangements with the US, which are relevant to Ms. Maxwell's extradition case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document