Henderson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Survivors
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anastasia Doe
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Lifestyles Convention
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of legal letter regarding unsealing of grand jury materials. | New York, NY (SDNY) | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of letter regarding CVRA rights and unsealing of grand jury materials. | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Filing of Document 681-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | US Court System | View |
| 2020-01-13 | N/A | Filing of Affirmation of Brittany N. Henderson in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice | US District Court, SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Brittany N. Henderson | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-09-21 | N/A | Brittany N. Henderson admitted to practice law in Florida | Florida | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal case | Henderson v Government of Australia case cited as precedent. | Australia | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914, 920 (7th Cir. 2003) | 7th Cir. | View |
051.pdf
This document is a letter dated January 10, 2020, from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding five specific cases involving 'Doe' plaintiffs against Darren K. Indyke and other Epstein-related entities. Edwards informs the court that while discussions with the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program are productive, his clients do not wish to stay their lawsuits. The letter also outlines an agreed-upon discovery schedule with the Estate's counsel, Mr. Moskowitz.
045.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a Motion to Dismiss in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. The plaintiff, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse beginning in 2001 at age 16, argues that the corporate defendants (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, and NES LLC) are liable for negligence, negligent security, and negligent supervision. The memorandum asserts these entities were integral to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, with employees facilitating the recruitment and scheduling of victims, and argues that claims are valid under the New York Child Victims Act.
044.pdf
This document is a letter from Bradley J. Edwards (Edwards Pottinger LLC), attorney for Plaintiff VE, to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter requests an extension of time to file an Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, moving the deadline from December 13, 2019, to December 18, 2019. The document includes Judge Nathan's handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement dated December 18, 2019.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
041.pdf
This document is a letter filed on December 9, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff (VE) will not file an amended pleading in response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed in November 2019, but will instead defend the existing First Amended Complaint. The document establishes the legal representation of the plaintiff by Edwards Pottinger LLC in this civil action against an Epstein-related entity.
028.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., dated November 12, 2019. Edwards opposes the Defendants' request for a two-week extension to respond to the complaint, arguing that they have already been granted a 45-day extension and that the upcoming Rule 26(f) conference should proceed. The letter notes that the Defendants' delay is related to a filing in the U.S. Virgin Islands regarding a 'claims resolution program' for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which the Plaintiff argues should not halt the current litigation.
024.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on October 16, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and serves to alert the court to a recent decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke) where Judge Castel allowed a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, supporting Edwards' client's similar motion.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC requests permission to represent Plaintiff 'VE' in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and associated entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC). Henderson certifies her good standing with the Florida bar.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
011-01.pdf
This document is an affirmation filed on January 13, 2020, by attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC, in support of her application for admission pro hac vice in the case of Anastasia Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Henderson declares she has no criminal record or disciplinary history and includes certificates of good standing from the Supreme Court of Florida (dated Dec 31, 2019) and The Florida Bar (dated Jan 10, 2020).
003.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on December 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Bradley J. Edwards seeks permission to represent Plaintiff Anastasia Doe in her lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahan, the co-executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Edwards attests to his good standing with the Florida and New York bars and lack of disciplinary history.
EFTA00019747.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorneys at Edwards Pottinger LLC (Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. They are coordinating scheduling for 'Epstein Client Meetings' which are explicitly identified as 'victim interviews' to take place on October 23 and 24, 2019, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza. The specific names of the victims being interviewed are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002105.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
DOJ-OGR-00010743.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a court document filed on June 26, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It lists attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Brittany N. Henderson of the law firm Edwards Pottinger, LLC as the submitters, including their contact information in Fort Lauderdale, FL.
DOJ-OGR-00010608.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated June 24, 2022, containing a personal statement from an individual named Kate. In the statement, Kate expresses her profound gratitude to her attorneys, Brad Edwards and Brittney Henderson, for their support and dedication during a trial. She specifically thanks them for fighting for what is right and concludes with a reflection on the importance of both forgiveness and consequences.
DOJ-OGR-00009598.jpg
This legal document outlines the Second Circuit's stringent standard for pre-indictment delay, which requires a defendant to prove both improper government purpose and serious, actual prejudice to their defense. It cites numerous legal precedents to emphasize the heavy burden on the defendant and to define substantial prejudice, noting that the mere loss of evidence or witnesses is typically insufficient. The document establishes that claims of pre-indictment delay are rarely successful.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017079.jpg
The document is a page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It contains a roster of approximately 43 individuals sorted alphabetically (names starting with H), detailing their names, job titles, affiliated organizations, and countries of origin. The document bears the bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017079, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025610.jpg
This document is a 'Presidential News Bulletin' titled 'The Shimon Post' dated April 3, 2011. It features a caricature header and lists six news articles from major international publications regarding geopolitical events in the Middle East and US foreign policy. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of evidence gathered during a government investigation.
RE: Crime Victims’ Rights Act Implications Regarding Unse...
Letter addressing the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials and urging the court to protect victims' rights under the CVRA.
RE: Crime Victims' Rights Act Implications Regarding Unse...
Legal letter addressing the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials and advocating for victims' rights under the CVRA.
Re: Epstein Victims
Clarification on FBI Victim Assistance coverage for counseling sessions (6 sessions generally, 12 for Florida residents with approval).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity