HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
2.98 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal memorandum / exhibit (law review article excerpt)
File Size:
2.98 MB
Summary
This document appears to be page 42 of a 78-page legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically arguing against the broad use of defense subpoenas to obtain victims' private information (such as mental health records). The text cites various legal precedents and Fourth Amendment arguments to support stronger privacy protections for victims in criminal proceedings.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney |
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating he is the filer or attorney associated with this submission to...
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Author/Legal Scholar |
Cited in the text as the author of the article 'Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal R...
|
| Troy Andrew Eid | Commentator/Author |
Cited in footnote 351 regarding Fourth Amendment approaches to physical examinations of sex offense victims.
|
| Murphy | Author |
Cited in footnote 351 regarding Crime Victims and the Fourth Amendment.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677'.
|
|
| Advisory Committee |
Referenced in the text regarding the drafting of legal rules (Rule 17 and Rule 18).
|
|
| Utah Law Review |
Publisher of the cited text (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Mentioned in legal citations.
|
|
| U.S. Department of Justice |
Mentioned in case citation.
|
Relationships (1)
David Schoen (filing attorney) includes a text written by Paul G. Cassell (author of the Law Review article) as an exhibit/argument.
Key Quotes (5)
"privacy interest in keeping personal facts away from the public eye."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
Quote #1
"a defense subpoena seeking third-party information about a crime victim rests on extraordinarily shaky ground."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
Quote #2
"Rule 17(c)(3) is intended to provide greater procedural protection for crime victims than exists under current law."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
Quote #3
"A defense subpoena must also not tread on a crime victim's constitutionally-protected privacy interests"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
Quote #4
"The Fourth Amendment is not only a right of criminal defendants, but a 'right of the people' to be free from unreasonable searches"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017677.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document